Literature DB >> 16033682

Organ trafficking: scope and ethical dilemma.

Eytan Mor1, Hagai Boas.   

Abstract

The Israeli experience discloses the relationship between the traditional altruistic basis of organ donation and the new alternatives based on a utilitarian conception of unrelated compensated donation. Although organ trafficking in Israel was dramatically intensified, cadaveric and living-related donations decreased. Reforms in living donations, such as evaluation committees for unrelated directed donors, were insignificant in terms of meeting the demand of patients and reducing the volume of trafficking. It is our contention that battling organ trafficking should provide patients with a realistic alternative for kidney donations. Our model of regulated nondirect paid donations is planned to legalize significant compensation for the unrelated donors drawing individuals from falling into the trap of organ traders. This program, together with uncompromised penalties, would hopefully eradicate organ trafficking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16033682     DOI: 10.1007/s11892-005-0026-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Diab Rep        ISSN: 1534-4827            Impact factor:   4.810


  10 in total

1.  Iranian kidney donors: motivations and relations with recipients.

Authors:  J Zargooshi
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  The right to sell or buy a kidney: are we failing our patients?

Authors:  Michael M Friedlaender
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-16       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  European Parliament approves organ trade ban.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-11-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Globalization and the trade in human body parts.

Authors:  T Harrison
Journal:  Can Rev Sociol Anthropol       Date:  1999-02

5.  South African doctors charged with involvement in organ trade.

Authors:  Pat Sidley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-24

6.  Commodification and exploitation: arguments in favour of compensated organ donation.

Authors:  L D de Castro
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.903

7.  A comparison of the results of renal transplantation from non-heart-beating, conventional cadaveric, and living donors.

Authors:  M L Nicholson; M S Metcalfe; S A White; J R Waller; T M Doughman; T Horsburgh; J Feehally; S J Carr; P S Veitch
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.612

8.  Incentive models to increase living kidney donation: encouraging without coercing.

Authors:  Ajay K Israni; Scott D Halpern; Sheldon Zink; Sonal A Sidhwani; Arthur Caplan
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 9.  Non-heart-beating donors.

Authors:  Dirk E M Van Raemdonck; Filip R Rega; Arne P Neyrinck; Nicole Jannis; Geert M Verleden; Toni E Lerut
Journal:  Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004

10.  Payment for living donor (vendor) kidneys: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Mark Schnitzler
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 8.086

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  The collective nature of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Ian Vincent McGonigle
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Israel's 2008 Organ Transplant Law: continued ethical challenges to the priority points model.

Authors:  Corinne Berzon
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2018-03-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.