Literature DB >> 16033097

CYFRA 21.1 in patients with cervical cancer: comparison with SCC and CEA.

Rafael Molina1, Xavier Filella, Jose M Augé, Elvira Bosch, Aureli Torne, Jaume Pahisa, Jose A Lejarcegui, Angels Rovirosa, Begoña Mellado, Jaume Ordi, Albert Biete.   

Abstract

The serum levels of CYFRA 21.1, CEA and SCC were prospectively determined in 156 patients diagnosed with carcinoma of the uterine cervix from 1995 to 2003. Histology revealed squamous cancer in 119 patients, adenocarcinoma in 25 patients and adenosquamous carcinoma in the remaining 12 patients. We considered 3.3 ng/ml, 5 ng/ml and 2 ng/ml as the upper limits of normality for CYFRA 21.1, CEA and SCC, respectively. The sensitivity of CYFRA 21.1, CEA and SCC was 26%, 25% and 43%, respectively, at diagnosis. SCC was clearly related to tumor histology, with significantly higher levels in squamous tumors than in other histological types (p<0.0001). The relationship of CEA with the histological type was poor, but the highest concentrations were found in adenocarcinomas (p=0.034). All the tumor markers were related to well known prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor stage, parametrial invasion and nodal involvement. Abnormal pretreatment serum levels indicated a high probability (>83%) of parametrial invasion in squamous tumors. Likewise, pretreatment SCC and CYFRA 21.1 serum levels were of prognostic value, with a shorter DFS and OS in patients with abnormal levels. Multivariate analysis indicated that stage, histological grade and parametrial invasion were independent prognostic factors, but not tumor markers. In conclusion, SCC is the tumor marker of choice in squamous tumors and the addition of CEA or CYFRA 21.1 does not significantly increase the sensitivity obtained by using SCC alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16033097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  9 in total

1.  Feasibility of CYFRA 21-1 as a serum biomarker for the detection of colorectal adenoma and advanced colorectal adenoma in people over the age of 45.

Authors:  Do Hyoung Lim; Jai Hyuen Lee; Jong Wan Kim
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Clinical Usefulness of Serum CYFRA 21-1 in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Jai Hyuen Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-06

3.  Serum Human Epididymis Protein 4 as a Prognostic Marker in Cervical Cancer.

Authors:  Woo Yeon Hwang; Dong Hoon Suh; Kidong Kim; Yong Beom Kim; Jae Hong No
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.339

4.  Clinical value of serum HMGB1 levels in early detection of recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix: comparison with serum SCCA, CYFRA21-1, and CEA levels.

Authors:  Xiugui Sheng; Xuelian Du; Xiaoling Zhang; Dapeng Li; Chunhua Lu; Qinshui Li; Zhifang Ma; Quqing Song; Cong Wang
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.351

5.  Prognostic Role of Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenhua Liu; Hongtai Shi
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-06-02       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Candidates for tumor markers of cervical cancer discovered by proteomic analysis.

Authors:  Jae Yun Song; Hyo Sook Bae; Do Hyoung Koo; Jae Kwan Lee; Hak Hyun Jung; Kyu Wan Lee; Nak Woo Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Serum biomarkers for early detection of gynecologic cancers.

Authors:  Yutaka Ueda; Takayuki Enomoto; Toshihiro Kimura; Takashi Miyatake; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Masami Fujita; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 6.639

8.  Matrix metalloproteinase-7 may serve as a novel biomarker for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Linyan Zhu; Xiaojiao Zheng; Yongming Du; Yan Xing; Kejun Xu; Lining Cui
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  SMYD2 promotes cervical cancer growth by stimulating cell proliferation.

Authors:  Jun-Jie Sun; Hong-Lin Li; Hui Ma; Yang Shi; Li-Rong Yin; Su-Jie Guo
Journal:  Cell Biosci       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 7.133

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.