Congruence, consensus, and the comparative phylogeography of codistributed species in California.

Comparative phylogeography has emerged as a means of understanding the spatial patterns of genetic divergence of codistributed species. However, researchers are often frustrated because of the lack of appropriate statistical tests to assess concordancy of multiple phylogeographic trees. We develop a method for testing congruence across multiple species and synthesizing the data into a regional supertree. Nine phylogeographic data sets of species with different life histories and ecologies were statistically compared using maximum agreement subtrees (MAST) and showed a high degree of concordancy. A supertree combining the different phylogeographic trees was then computed using matrix representation with parsimony, and the groups defined by this supertree were tested against climatic data to investigate a potential mechanism driving divergence. Our data suggest that species and genetic lineages in California are shaped by climatic regimes. The supertree method in combination with MAST represents a new approach to test congruence hypotheses and detect common geographic signals in comparative phylogeography.