Literature DB >> 16030332

How tobacco-friendly science escapes scrutiny in the courtroom.

Lissy C Friedman1, Richard A Daynard, Christopher N Banthin.   

Abstract

Although the tobacco industry helped fund the attack on "junk science," it has created its own dubious scientific scholarship for its expert witnesses. We suggest that plaintiffs' counsel should be proactive in using Daubert hearings to exclude the tobacco industry defendants' scientific expert witnesses by introducing documentation, such as we have found through researching previously privileged internal industry documents, to prove that much of their proposed testimony was developed by and for their lawyers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16030332     DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.046227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  9 in total

1.  False claims in tobacco litigation junk science article.

Authors:  W Kip Viscusi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-03-29       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  The vector of the tobacco epidemic: tobacco industry practices in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Sungkyu Lee; Pamela M Ling; Stanton A Glantz
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.506

Review 3.  Tobacco industry use of judicial seminars to influence rulings in products liability litigation.

Authors:  L C Friedman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Criteria for evaluating tobacco control research funding programs and their application to models that include financial support from the tobacco industry.

Authors:  J E Cohen; M Zeller; T Eissenberg; M Parascandola; R O'Keefe; L Planinac; S Leischow
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Testimony by otolaryngologists in defense of tobacco companies 2009-2014.

Authors:  Robert K Jackler
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Big tobacco focuses on the facts to hide the truth: an algorithmic exploration of courtroom tropes and taboos.

Authors:  Stephan Risi; Robert N Proctor
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  "A good personal scientific relationship": Philip Morris scientists and the Chulabhorn Research Institute, Bangkok.

Authors:  Ross Mackenzie; Jeff Collin
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 11.069

8.  Representation and misrepresentation of scientific evidence in contemporary tobacco regulation: a review of tobacco industry submissions to the UK Government consultation on standardised packaging.

Authors:  Selda Ulucanlar; Gary J Fooks; Jenny L Hatchard; Anna B Gilmore
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  The atlas network: a "strategic ally" of the tobacco industry.

Authors:  Julia Smith; Sheryl Thompson; Kelley Lee
Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage       Date:  2016-04-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.