Literature DB >> 16030306

Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants.

Elizabeth B Lamont1, James E Herndon, Jane C Weeks, I Craig Henderson, Rogerio Lilenbaum, Richard L Schilsky, Nicholas A Christakis.   

Abstract

To determine the accuracy with which Medicare claims data measure chemotherapy use in elderly Medicare beneficiaries with cancer, we performed a criterion validation study. We compared gold-standard clinical trial data for 175 elderly cancer patients treated in two Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) breast and lung cancer trials (i.e., 45 from trial 9344 and 130 from trial 9730) with contemporaneous ambulatory and in-patient Medicare health insurance claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The breast trial participants studied were those elderly enrolled between 1995 and 1997 and treated with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide or this combination with paclitaxel. The lung trial participants studied were those elderly enrolled between 1998 and 2000 and treated with paclitaxel and carboplatin or paclitaxel alone. Comparing CALGB data with Medicare claims, we found the crude sensitivity for chemotherapy administration was 93% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 88% to 96%). Individual chemotherapy agents had similarly high sensitivities, ranging from 81% (95% CI = 70% to 89%) for carboplatin to 91% (95% CI = 79% to 98%) for cyclophosphamide. Agent-specific specificities were 100%. CMS data reliably captured repeat administration of chemotherapy to within one cycle. Administrative Medicare claims data appear to be a valid source of information for chemotherapy administered to elderly Medicare beneficiaries with cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16030306     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dji189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  35 in total

1.  Validation of electronic data on chemotherapy and hormone therapy use in HMOs.

Authors:  Debra P Ritzwoller; Nikki Carroll; Thomas Delate; Maureen O'Keeffe-Rossetti; Paul A Fishman; Elizabeth T Loggers; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Jennifer Elston-Lafata; Mark C Hornbrook
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Racial disparities in cancer therapy: did the gap narrow between 1992 and 2002?

Authors:  Cary P Gross; Benjamin D Smith; Elizabeth Wolf; Martin Andersen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  The characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of older adults aged 80 and over with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Mark A Fiala; Nicole C Foley; Sonja Zweegman; Ravi Vij; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 3.599

4.  Utility of administrative claims data for the study of brain metastases: a validation study.

Authors:  April F Eichler; Elizabeth B Lamont
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2009-06-27       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Anthracycline regimen adherence in older patients with early breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Ning Zhang; Hui Zhao; Zhigang Duan; Thomas A Buchholz; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-02-27

6.  Undertreatment of Older Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Era of Novel Therapies.

Authors:  Bita Fakhri; Mark A Fiala; Sascha A Tuchman; Tanya M Wildes
Journal:  Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk       Date:  2018-01-31

7.  Risk of hospitalization according to chemotherapy regimen in early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Carlos H Barcenas; Jiangong Niu; Ning Zhang; Yufeng Zhang; Thomas A Buchholz; Linda S Elting; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Benjamin D Smith; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Measuring clinically significant chemotherapy-related toxicities using Medicare claims from Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial participants.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Lamont; James E Herndon; Jane C Weeks; I Craig Henderson; Rogerio Lilenbaum; Richard L Schilsky; Nicholas A Christakis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Factors Associated With Unplanned Hospitalizations Among Patients With Nonmetastatic Colorectal Cancers Intended for Treatment in the Ambulatory Setting.

Authors:  Kristen L Fessele; Matthew J Hayat; Deborah K Mayer; Robert L Atkins
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Intended versus inferred management after PET for cancer restaging: analysis of Medicare claims linked to a coverage with evidence development registry.

Authors:  Bruce E Hillner; Tor D Tosteson; Anna N A Tosteson; Qianfei Wang; Yunjie Song; Tracy Onega; Lucy G Hanna; Barry A Siegel
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.