Literature DB >> 16028792

Manufacturer predicted and measured REAR values in adult hearing aid fitting: accuracy and clinical usefulness.

Nancy L Aarts1, Carrie S Caffee.   

Abstract

Audiologists may fit hearing aids using real-ear aided response (REAR) values predicted by manufacturer's fitting software, rather than actual measured REARs. This study examined how well one manufacturer's software was able to predict REARs for a DSP behind-the-ear product in 41 adults (N = 79 ears) under four conditions (two hearing loss configurations and two inputs). Results showed that for all ears tested, measured REAR values were significantly different from predicted for most of the audiometric frequencies for all four test conditions. Discrepancies between measured and predicted REAR values were greater in males' ears than females'. Few ears' REAR values (< or = 12%) were judged to be clinically similar to predicted. Results suggest audiologists should consider using individual real-ear measures in adult hearing aid fittings until manufacturer software is shown to accurately predict real-ear hearing aid performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028792     DOI: 10.1080/14992020500057830

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  5 in total

1.  Temporal resolution with a prescriptive fitting formula.

Authors:  Marc A Brennan; Frederick J Gallun; Pamela E Souza; G Christopher Stecker
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Strategies of Adult Hearing Aid Selection.

Authors:  J L Northern
Journal:  Audiol Res       Date:  2011-03-23

Review 3.  Verification and validation of hearing aids: Opportunity not an obstacle.

Authors:  Lindsey E Jorgensen
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2016-05-14

4.  Does probe-tube verification of real-ear hearing aid amplification characteristics improve outcomes in adult hearing aid users? A protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Ibrahim Almufarrij; Kevin J Munro; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-07-19       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Comparison: real and simulated ear insertion gain.

Authors:  Patrícia Danieli Campos; Maria Fernanda Capoani Garcia Mondelli; Debora Viviane Ferrari
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.