Literature DB >> 16028699

In silico and wet-bench identification of nuclear matrix attachment regions.

Stephen A Krawetz1, Sorin Draghici, Robert Goodrich, Zhandong Liu, G Charles Ostermeier.   

Abstract

Chromatin loops are tethered at discrete regions that are approx 100-1000 bp in length. These regions of attachment serve as specific sequence landmarks, anchoring the DNA to the fibers of the chromosomal scaffold. It has been estimated that our genome contains 70,000 nuclear matrix attachment sites that serve as a dynamic nuclear organizer in both the interphase and metaphase cell. Approximately 30,000-40,000 matrix attachment regions (MARs) serve as origins of replication. MARs can also be associated with chromosomal segments densely populated with transcription factor-binding sites. This may facilitate transcription that is initiated within the region of the chromosome coincident with the surface of the nuclear matrix. Assuming an average somatic loop size of 100 kb, it is reasonable to propose that each cell utilizes 30,000 MARs to anchor each of the approx 20,000 active genic domains. This is sufficient to encompass the 30,000 functional genes in our genome that exist as members of single or multigenic families, each constituting a single chromatin domain. With the sequencing phase of various genome projects complete, in silico tools are being developed to identify the long-range control elements that modulate gene expression. This information is necessary to specifically target the time-intensive wet-bench verification and expression experiments that will provide a unified understanding of gene regulation. In this chapter we review some of the in silico strategies that are currently available and a new in vivo method based on the real-time polymerase chain reaction, to assess regions of matrix association.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028699     DOI: 10.1385/1-59259-850-1:439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Med        ISSN: 1543-1894


  7 in total

1.  Nuclear matrix association: switching to the invasive cytotrophoblast.

Authors:  K J Drennan; A K Linnemann; A E Platts; H H Heng; D R Armant; S A Krawetz
Journal:  Placenta       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 2.  Non-genetic contributions of the sperm nucleus to embryonic development.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Yamauchi; Jeffrey A Shaman; W Steven Ward
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  CTCF binds to sites in the major histocompatibility complex that are rapidly reconfigured in response to interferon-gamma.

Authors:  Diego Ottaviani; Elliott Lever; Shihong Mao; Rossitza Christova; Babatunji W Ogunkolade; Tania A Jones; Jaroslaw Szary; Johan Aarum; Muhammad A Mumin; Christopher A Pieri; Stephen A Krawetz; Denise Sheer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A comparative study of S/MAR prediction tools.

Authors:  Kenneth Evans; Sascha Ott; Annika Hansen; Georgy Koentges; Lorenz Wernisch
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  In-silico prediction and observations of nuclear matrix attachment.

Authors:  Adrian E Platts; Amelia K Quayle; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Cell Mol Biol Lett       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.787

6.  Reconfiguration of genomic anchors upon transcriptional activation of the human major histocompatibility complex.

Authors:  Diego Ottaviani; Elliott Lever; Richard Mitter; Tania Jones; Tim Forshew; Rossitza Christova; Eleni M Tomazou; Vardhman K Rakyan; Stephen A Krawetz; Adrian E Platts; Badmavady Segarane; Stephan Beck; Denise Sheer
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Differential nuclear scaffold/matrix attachment marks expressed genes.

Authors:  Amelia K Linnemann; Adrian E Platts; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 6.150

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.