Literature DB >> 16028626

Risk factors for faecal sand excretion in Icelandic horses.

L Husted1, M S Andersen, O K Borggaard, H Houe, S N Olsen.   

Abstract

REASONS FOR PERFORMING STUDY: Sandy soil is often mentioned as a risk factor in the development of sand-related gastrointestinal disease (SGID) in the horse. There are other variables, but few studies confirm any of these.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate soil type, pasture quality, feeding practice in the paddock, age, sex and body condition score as risk factors for sand intake in the horse.
METHODS: Faeces were collected from 211 Icelandic horses on 19 different studs in Denmark together with soil samples and other potential risk factors. Sand content in faeces determined by a sand sedimentation test was interpreted as evidence of sand intake. Soil types were identified by soil analysis and significance of the data was tested using logistic analysis.
RESULTS: Of horses included in the study, 56.4% showed sand in the faeces and 5.7% had more than 5 mm sand as quantified by the rectal sleeve sedimentation test. Soil type had no significant effect when tested as main effect, but there was interaction between soil type and pasture quality. Significant interactions were also found between paddock feeding practice and pasture quality.
CONCLUSION: To evaluate the risk of sand intake it is important to consider 3 variables: soil type, pasture quality and feeding practice. Pasture quality was identified as a risk factor of both short and long grass in combination with sandy soil, while clay soil had the lowest risk in these combinations. Feeding practice in the paddock revealed feeding directly on the ground to be a risk factor when there was short (1-5 cm) or no grass. Also, no feeding outdoors increased the risk on pastures with short grass, while this had no effect in paddocks with no grass. More than 50% of all horses investigated in this study had sand in the faeces. POTENTIAL RELEVANCE: The identification of risk factors is an important step towards prevention of SGID. Further research is necessary to determine why some horses exhibit more than 5 mm sand in the sedimentation test and whether this is correlated with geophagic behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028626     DOI: 10.2746/0425164054529373

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Equine Vet J        ISSN: 0425-1644            Impact factor:   2.888


  5 in total

1.  Sand accumulation in the digestive tract of rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and guinea pigs (Cavia porcellus): The role of the appendix.

Authors:  Nicole Winter; Marcus Clauss; Daryl Codron; Jürgen Hummel; Jaqueline Müller; Henning Richter; Patrick Kircher; Jean-Michel Hatt; Louise Françoise Martin
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 1.966

2.  Comparison of psyllium feeding at home and nasogastric intubation of psyllium and magnesium sulfate in the hospital as a treatment for naturally occurring colonic sand (geosediment) accumulations in horses: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Ritva Kaikkonen; Kati Niinistö; Tiina Lindholm; Marja Raekallio
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 1.695

3.  Preliminary evidence for a forestomach washing mechanism in llamas (Lama glama).

Authors:  Jean-Michel Hatt; Daryl Codron; Henning Richter; Patrick R Kircher; Jürgen Hummel; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  Mamm Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 1.863

4.  Radiographic parameters for diagnosing sand colic in horses.

Authors:  Anna Kendall; Charles Ley; Agneta Egenvall; Johan Bröjer
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Risk Factors for Equine Gastric Glandular Disease: A Case-Control Study in a Finnish Referral Hospital Population.

Authors:  J Mönki; M Hewetson; A-M K Virtala
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.333

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.