Literature DB >> 16028240

Depth-dependent proton magnetization transfer in articular cartilage.

Ravinder R Regatte1, Sarma V S Akella, Ravinder Reddy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the proton magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) maps in control and collagen-depleted bovine patellar cartilage specimens as a function of cartilage depth during mechanical compression.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One-dimensional proton projection MR images employing a spin-echo imaging sequence were obtained on a custom-built NMR spectrometer interfaced to an Oxford magnet operating at 2T. The mechanical compressions were performed with a custom-built MR-compatible pressure cell and evaluated dynamically via one-dimensional projection. High-spatial-resolution two-dimensional MT images were obtained using a fast spin-echo (FSE) sequence on a 4T whole-body GE Signa scanner (GEMS, Milwaukee, WI, USA) to quantify the MTR maps of normal and collagen-depleted bovine patellae.
RESULTS: All of the cartilage plugs from the bovine patellae showed that the MTR value increases continuously as a function of cartilage depth. Although the overall MTR trend as a function of depth is the same in both control and collagen-depleted cartilage, the magnitude of the MTR value differs between the two. The MTR value is decreased with collagen depletion and increased with mechanical compression. The increase in MTR value during compression may be due to a decrease in free water content and volume, resulting in an increase in collagen concentration.
CONCLUSION: We demonstrated that the MTR in bovine patellar cartilage is depth-dependent and is relatively higher in the radial zone compared to the superficial zone. The high MTR in the radial zone not only depends on collagen content, it may also reflect a number of other parameters, such as the arrangement of macromolecules, high solid content, bound water fraction attached to macromolecules, radial orientation, etc. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16028240     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  9 in total

1.  Selective 3D ultrashort TE imaging: comparison of "dual-echo" acquisition and magnetization preparation for improving short-T 2 contrast.

Authors:  Jürgen Rahmer; Ulrike Blume; Peter Börnert
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Evaluation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, biochemical and mechanical properties of trypsin-treated intervertebral discs under physiological compression loading.

Authors:  Fackson Mwale; Caroline N Demers; Arthur J Michalek; Gilles Beaudoin; Tapas Goswami; Lorne Beckman; James C Iatridis; John Antoniou
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  MR imaging of articular cartilage physiology.

Authors:  Jung-Ah Choi; Garry E Gold
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Sensitivity and specificity of univariate MRI analysis of experimentally degraded cartilage under clinical imaging conditions.

Authors:  Vanessa A Lukas; Kenneth W Fishbein; David A Reiter; Ping-Chang Lin; Erika Schneider; Richard G Spencer
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Quantitative parametric MRI of articular cartilage: a review of progress and open challenges.

Authors:  D A Binks; R J Hodgson; M E Ries; R J Foster; S W Smye; D McGonagle; A Radjenovic
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  The application of T1 and T2 relaxation time and magnetization transfer ratios to the early diagnosis of patellar cartilage osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Weiwu Yao; Nan Qu; Zhihua Lu; Shixun Yang
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Macromolecular fraction (MMF) from 3D ultrashort echo time cones magnetization transfer (3D UTE-Cones-MT) imaging predicts meniscal degeneration and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  X Zhang; Y-J Ma; Z Wei; M Wu; A Ashir; S Jerban; S Li; E Y Chang; J Du
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2021-04-18       Impact factor: 6.576

8.  Review of Quantitative Knee Articular Cartilage MR Imaging.

Authors:  Mai Banjar; Saya Horiuchi; David N Gedeon; Hiroshi Yoshioka
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.760

9.  Quantitative evaluation in combination with nonquantitative evaluation in early patellar cartilage osteoarthritis at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Houdong Zuo; Weiwu Yao; Nan Qu; Shixun Yang; Jianhua Wang; Xiaojiang Cui
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.458

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.