Literature DB >> 16027568

A meta-analysis of the effect of hospital-based case management on hospital length-of-stay and readmission.

Young-Ju Kim1, Karen L Soeken.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many hospital-based case management (CM) interventions have been studied, there is little work summarizing the effectiveness of these studies.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of hospital-based CM compared with usual care on length of hospital stay and readmission rate.
METHOD: A meta-analytic method was employed to analyze the effect sizes of CM intervention on outcomes. Eligible studies were retrieved using computerized database searches, footnote chasing, and contact with content experts. The authors reviewed the final 12 studies, and the effect size, 95% confidence interval (CI), sensitivity, homogeneity, and publication bias were analyzed.
RESULTS: The overall average weighted effect size on length of stay (LOS) was 0.094 with a 95% CI of -0.032 to 0.220. The overall odds ratio for readmission was 0.87 with a 95% CI of 0.69 to 1.04. Overall, hospital-based CM interventions were not significantly effective in reducing LOS and readmissions. However, CM for patients with heart failure (effect size of 0.241 with a 95% CI of 0.012 to 0.470) was significantly effective in reducing LOS, although it was not effective for stroke patients (effect size of -0.226 with a 95% CI of -0.542 to 0.089) and frail elders (effect size of 0.126 with a 95% CI of -0.073 to 0.324). Analysis indicated that in this meta-analysis publication bias was unlikely. DISCUSSION: The findings of this meta-analysis demonstrate a 6% decrease in readmission rate for patients who received hospital-based CM interventions. Further meta-analytic studies are needed to investigate the effectiveness of CM on other outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027568     DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200507000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  7 in total

Review 1.  The effectiveness of chronic care management for heart failure: meta-regression analyses to explain the heterogeneity in outcomes.

Authors:  Hanneke W Drewes; Lotte M G Steuten; Lidwien C Lemmens; Caroline A Baan; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Arianne M J Elissen; Karin M M Lemmens; Jolanda A C Meeuwissen; Hubertus J M Vrijhoef
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Role of self-care in the patient with heart failure.

Authors:  Debra K Moser; Victoria Dickson; Tiny Jaarsma; Christopher Lee; Anna Stromberg; Barbara Riegel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Evaluation of a high-risk case management pilot program for Medicare beneficiaries with Medigap coverage.

Authors:  Kevin Hawkins; Paula M Parker; Cynthia E Hommer; Gandhi R Bhattarai; Jinghua Huang; Timothy S Wells; Ronald J Ozminkowski; Charlotte S Yeh
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 2.459

Review 4.  A meta-review of evidence on heart failure disease management programs: the challenges of describing and synthesizing evidence on complex interventions.

Authors:  Lori A Savard; David R Thompson; Alexander M Clark
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Using meta-analyses for comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Vicki S Conn; Todd M Ruppar; Lorraine J Phillips; Jo-Ana D Chase
Journal:  Nurs Outlook       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  The effect of clinical interventions on hospital readmissions: a meta-review of published meta-analyses.

Authors:  Jochanan Benbassat; Mark I Taragin
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2013-01-23

Review 7.  Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian N Wulff; Marianne Thygesen; Jens Søndergaard; Peter Vedsted
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.