Literature DB >> 16027186

Influence of neck-rail placement on free-stall preference, use, and cleanliness.

C B Tucker1, D M Weary, D Fraser.   

Abstract

Three experiments examined how the presence of a neck rail at different heights and locations influenced dairy cattle behavior and stall cleanliness. Experiment 1 compared 4 levels of neck-rail height (102, 114, and 127 cm and no neck rail; presented at 160 or 180 cm from the curb) in a preference test. Cows (n = 10) showed no consistent preference based on neck-rail height, regardless of the horizontal position of the neck rail. When cows were restricted to each treatment in turn, however, time spent standing fully (with all 4 hooves) in the stall was least in the stall with the lowest neck rail (mean, 22 min/24 h) and was greatest in the stall with no neck rail (mean, 83 min/24 h). A second experiment examined the effect of a neck rail placed at 3 distances from the curb (140, 175, and 233 cm) when height was held constant (131 cm; n = 12). Time spent standing fully in the stall was least when the neck rail was close to the curb (140 cm; mean, 11 min/24 h) and was greatest when the neck rail was furthest from the curb (233 cm; mean, 86 min/24 h). When the neck rail was far from the curb, the cows were more likely to soil the stall by defecating while standing fully in the stall. Experiment 3 compared soiling of the stall by 14 cows with and without a neck rail at a height of 124.5 cm. When the neck rail was removed, cows were more than twice as likely to soil the stall by defecating while standing fully in the stall compared with when the neck rail was present (1.3 vs. 0.5 defecations/24 h). Thus, restrictive neck-rail placement prevents cows from standing in stall, but helps keep stalls clean. Access to more comfortable flooring surfaces outside the stall may help mitigate the negative effects of restrictive neck rails.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16027186     DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72952-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  7 in total

1.  Dairy cows value an open area for lying down.

Authors:  Laura Shewbridge Carter; Marie J Haskell; David Ball; Jenny Gibbons; W Edwin Harris; S Mark Rutter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Prepartum Lying Behavior of Holstein Dairy Cows Housed on Pasture through Parturition.

Authors:  Christa A Rice; Nicole L Eberhart; Peter D Krawczel
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Free-Stall Use and Preferences in Dairy Cows: A Case Study on Neck Rails Covered by Foam.

Authors:  Marek Gaworski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2009-07-09

5.  Comparison of Cattle Housing Systems Based on the Criterion of Damage to Barn Equipment and Construction Errors.

Authors:  Marek Gaworski; Michał Boćkowski
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.231

6.  Risk factors associated with cows' lying time, stall and cows' own cleanliness in smallholder dairy farms in Kenya.

Authors:  E K Kathambi; J A VanLeeuwen; G K Gitau; C Kamunde
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-07-21

7.  Effects of cubicle characteristics on animal welfare indicators in dairy cattle.

Authors:  D Gieseke; C Lambertz; M Gauly
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.