Literature DB >> 16026847

Mechanomyographic response to transcranial magnetic stimulation from biceps brachii and during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on extensor carpi radialis.

Mohammed Faruque Reza1, Katsunori Ikoma, Takayo Chuma, Yukio Mano.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) elicits short latency excitatory responses in the target muscles, termed motor evoked potential (MEP). When TMS is delivered during a voluntary contraction, the MEP is followed by a period of silence called silent period (SP). These MEP parameters are in general recordable by electromyography (EMG). Mechanomyography (MMG) on the other hand is the mechanical counterpart of EMG. Thus, this study has been conducted to observe whether the MEP parameters from MMG signals showed similar trait of EMG recordings. Five normal healthy male subjects were included in this study. The subjects were required to perform right biceps brachii muscles contraction at diverse graded of load level at 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, and 100% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC). MEPs by single pulse TMS on left hemisphere were obtained from both EMG electrode and MMG accelerometer at rest and at different levels of predetermined load level. MEP amplitude and area obtained both from EMG and MMG record were increased with the increase of muscle contraction with a maximum of 60% MVC. With increasing the level of contraction there was a shortening of onset latency and decreasing in the length of silent period in both EMG and MMG signals. We also recorded the EMG- and MMG-MEP from the right extensor carpi radialis muscle during transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation in order to observe neural changes in sensory stimulation from both EMG and MMG responses. The EMG-MEP was not visible in electrical artifact whereas it was obvious in MMG responses. In accordance with other study, this study showed that the voluntary contraction of biceps brachii muscle influenced the MEP parameter which are moreover obtainable by MMG even in electrical noise may provide insight for future study.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16026847     DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci Methods        ISSN: 0165-0270            Impact factor:   2.390


  6 in total

1.  A new measure of cortical inhibition by mechanomyography and paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation in unanesthetized rats.

Authors:  Tsung-Hsun Hsieh; Sameer C Dhamne; Jia-Jin J Chen; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances E Jensen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Exercise and fatigue.

Authors:  Wim Ament; Gijsbertus J Verkerke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  A systematic review of muscle activity assessment of the biceps brachii muscle using mechanomyography.

Authors:  Irsa Talib; Kenneth Sundaraj; Chee Kiang Lam; Sebastian Sundaraj
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.041

4.  Association of anthropometric parameters with amplitude and crosstalk of mechanomyographic signals during forearm flexion, pronation and supination torque tasks.

Authors:  Irsa Talib; Kenneth Sundaraj; Chee Kiang Lam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Real-time changes in corticospinal excitability during voluntary contraction with concurrent electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Tomofumi Yamaguchi; Kenichi Sugawara; Satoshi Tanaka; Naoshin Yoshida; Kei Saito; Shigeo Tanabe; Yoshihiro Muraoka; Meigen Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Mechanomyogram for muscle function assessment: a review.

Authors:  Md Anamul Islam; Kenneth Sundaraj; R Badlishah Ahmad; Nizam Uddin Ahamed
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.