Claire D Brindis1, Virginia S Loo, Nancy E Adler, Gail A Bolan, Judith N Wasserheit. 1. Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California, USA. brindis@itsa.ucsf.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: To aid front-line program administrators and providers in adopting national reproductive health recommendations, this exploratory case study examines the implementation of service integration and teen friendliness as strategies to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health. METHODS: The project team conducted semi-structured interviews with administrators, providers, and adolescent clients from 10 clinical adolescent sexual and reproductive health service agencies in Alameda County, California. Programs were placed into a topology of integrated service delivery models. The teen friendliness of each program was assessed. Spearman rank correlations were calculated to evaluate the relationship between integration and teen friendliness. RESULTS: Clinical programs exhibited a great range of service delivery models within the integration topology. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counseling and testing services were poorly integrated into clinic services. Teen friendliness and integration showed a negative, but not statistically significant, correlation (R = -.45, p = .19). CONCLUSION: Programs have made different levels of commitment to service integration or teen friendliness policies. Lessons learned through the integration of sexually transmitted disease (STD) and family planning services may assist efforts to better integrate HIV services for adolescents. Further work to elucidate the relationship between integration and teen friendliness is needed. Periodic reviews can ensure that recommended clinical guidelines, specifically annual risk assessment, are being met, as well as identifying achievable next steps to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health service delivery.
PURPOSE: To aid front-line program administrators and providers in adopting national reproductive health recommendations, this exploratory case study examines the implementation of service integration and teen friendliness as strategies to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health. METHODS: The project team conducted semi-structured interviews with administrators, providers, and adolescent clients from 10 clinical adolescent sexual and reproductive health service agencies in Alameda County, California. Programs were placed into a topology of integrated service delivery models. The teen friendliness of each program was assessed. Spearman rank correlations were calculated to evaluate the relationship between integration and teen friendliness. RESULTS: Clinical programs exhibited a great range of service delivery models within the integration topology. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) counseling and testing services were poorly integrated into clinic services. Teen friendliness and integration showed a negative, but not statistically significant, correlation (R = -.45, p = .19). CONCLUSION: Programs have made different levels of commitment to service integration or teen friendliness policies. Lessons learned through the integration of sexually transmitted disease (STD) and family planning services may assist efforts to better integrate HIV services for adolescents. Further work to elucidate the relationship between integration and teen friendliness is needed. Periodic reviews can ensure that recommended clinical guidelines, specifically annual risk assessment, are being met, as well as identifying achievable next steps to improve adolescent sexual and reproductive health service delivery.
Authors: Anna W Brittain; Jessica R Williams; Lauren B Zapata; Karen Pazol; Lisa M Romero; Tasmeen S Weik Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Anna W Brittain; Ana Carolina Loyola Briceno; Karen Pazol; Lauren B Zapata; Emily Decker; Julia M Rollison; Nikita M Malcolm; Lisa M Romero; Emilia H Koumans Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Susannah H Mayhew; George B Ploubidis; Andy Sloggett; Kathryn Church; Carol D Obure; Isolde Birdthistle; Sedona Sweeney; Charlotte E Warren; Charlotte Watts; Anna Vassall Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-01-22 Impact factor: 3.240