BACKGROUND: Objective criteria for the assessment of patients with lipodystrophy syndrome in human immunodeficiency virus infection (LDHIV) have not emerged. METHODS: We compared regional body fat changes in 13 men with severe LDHIV on protease inhibitor-inclusive antiretroviral therapy with 13 control HIV-infected men using anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: LDHIV patients, compared with control subjects, had thinner gluteal, suprailiac, and triceps skinfolds (p < .01) and increased waist circumference (98 +/- 5 cm vs 86 +/- 9 cm, respectively; p = .0008). DEXA studies revealed reduced lower extremity fat (12 +/- 5% vs 22 +/- 9%; p = .0006), increased head and neck fat (18 +/- 3% vs 16 +/- 1%; p = .01), and increased proportion of total body fat in the trunk (65 +/- 7% vs 53 +/- 8%; p = .0005). MRI analysis revealed reduced thigh fat (12 +/- 5% vs 22 +/- 12%; p = .01), increased dorsocervical fat depth (47 +/- 24 mm vs 19 +/- 7 mm; p = .0009), and nearly significant increase in intra-abdominal fat (218 +/- 90 cm2 vs 157 +/- 70 cm2; p = .057). Interestingly, control subjects showed a positive relationship between intra-abdominal and dorsocervical fat (r= .57, p = .04), but the LDHIV patients showed a negative relationship (r= -.55, p = .05), suggesting a novel split phenotype among LDHIV patients of either dorsocervical or intra-abdominal fat accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that MRI provides the best tools for definition of LDHIV syndrome and reveals variable phenotypes among LDHIV patients.
BACKGROUND: Objective criteria for the assessment of patients with lipodystrophy syndrome in human immunodeficiency virus infection (LDHIV) have not emerged. METHODS: We compared regional body fat changes in 13 men with severe LDHIV on protease inhibitor-inclusive antiretroviral therapy with 13 control HIV-infectedmen using anthropometry, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), and whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). RESULTS: LDHIV patients, compared with control subjects, had thinner gluteal, suprailiac, and triceps skinfolds (p < .01) and increased waist circumference (98 +/- 5 cm vs 86 +/- 9 cm, respectively; p = .0008). DEXA studies revealed reduced lower extremity fat (12 +/- 5% vs 22 +/- 9%; p = .0006), increased head and neck fat (18 +/- 3% vs 16 +/- 1%; p = .01), and increased proportion of total body fat in the trunk (65 +/- 7% vs 53 +/- 8%; p = .0005). MRI analysis revealed reduced thigh fat (12 +/- 5% vs 22 +/- 12%; p = .01), increased dorsocervical fat depth (47 +/- 24 mm vs 19 +/- 7 mm; p = .0009), and nearly significant increase in intra-abdominal fat (218 +/- 90 cm2 vs 157 +/- 70 cm2; p = .057). Interestingly, control subjects showed a positive relationship between intra-abdominal and dorsocervical fat (r= .57, p = .04), but the LDHIV patients showed a negative relationship (r= -.55, p = .05), suggesting a novel split phenotype among LDHIV patients of either dorsocervical or intra-abdominal fat accumulation. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that MRI provides the best tools for definition of LDHIV syndrome and reveals variable phenotypes among LDHIV patients.
Authors: P Freitas; D Carvalho; A C Santos; J Mesquita; F Correia; S Xerinda; R Marques; E Martinez; A Sarmento; J L Medina Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2011-07-05 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: April Bingham; Gulnara Mamyrova; Kristina I Rother; Elif Oral; Elaine Cochran; Ahalya Premkumar; David Kleiner; Laura James-Newton; Ira N Targoff; Janardan P Pandey; Danielle Mercatante Carrick; Nancy Sebring; Terrance P O'Hanlon; Maria Ruiz-Hidalgo; Maria Turner; Leslie B Gordon; Jorge Laborda; Steven R Bauer; Perry J Blackshear; Lisa Imundo; Frederick W Miller; Lisa G Rider Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2008-03 Impact factor: 1.817
Authors: Maria C Foss-Freitas; Rafael C Ferraz; Luciana Z Monteiro; Patricia M Gomes; Ricardo Iwakura; Luiz Carlos C de Freitas; Milton C Foss Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 3.320