Literature DB >> 16025620

Two models of ethics committees.

Simon Clarke1.   

Abstract

A distinction is made between two models of ethics committees. According to the Mirror Model, ethics committees ought to reflect the values of society. The Critical Model says committees are to critically examine these standards rather than merely reflect them. It is argued that the Critical Model should be accepted because a society's ethical standards can be mistaken and a society that has Critical rather than merely Mirror ethics committees is more likely to have such mistakes revealed. Some implications of the Critical Model are discussed.

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16025620     DOI: 10.1007/bf02448814

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bioeth Inq        ISSN: 1176-7529            Impact factor:   1.352


  3 in total

1.  Ethical review of innovative treatment.

Authors:  Donald Evans
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2002-03

2.  Medical paternalism.

Authors:  Allen Buchanan
Journal:  Philos Public Aff       Date:  1978

3.  Social moral epistemology.

Authors:  Allen Buchanan
Journal:  Soc Philos Policy       Date:  2002
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Ethics committees and the legality of research.

Authors:  T M Douglas
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.