Literature DB >> 16025052

Radiofrequency excision versus monopolar electrosurgical excision for tonsillectomy.

Philip D Littlefield1, Daniel J Hall, Michael R Holtel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We previously compared radiofrequency (Evac) tonsillotomy with monopolar electrosurgical (Bovie) tonsillectomy and showed significantly less pain with the Evac. Tonsillotomy leaves a cuff of tonsil behind, the significance of which is unknown. We hypothesize that Evac tonsillectomy also is less painful than Bovie tonsillectomy. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: We compared Evac (ENTec Evac 70; ArthroCare, Sunnyvale, CA) and Bovie tonsillectomy in a prospective, blinded fashion. Each participant had 1 tonsil removed by each device. We recorded, by side, the surgical time, blood loss, operative difficulty, pain (postoperative days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14), and the side that each patient preferred.
RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 17 patients. They reported significantly less pain with the Evac (P < 0.036, F = 5.87). The Evac was preferred by 12 of 14 patients.
CONCLUSION: Evac tonsillectomy is significantly less painful than Bovie tonsillectomy. Patients blinded to treatment preferred the Evac technique. SIGNIFICANCE: The Evac device decreases postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16025052     DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.02.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  9 in total

1.  A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Coblation versus Dissection Tonsillectomy in Adult Patients.

Authors:  Singh Rakesh; T S Anand; Garg Payal; Kulshreshtha Pranjal
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-11-30

Review 2.  Coblation versus other surgical techniques for tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Melissa Pynnonen; Jennifer V Brinkmeier; Marc C Thorne; Lee Yee Chong; Martin J Burton
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-22

3.  [Tonsillectomy technique: bipolar scissors vs raspatory: results of a case control study in 138 patients].

Authors:  H v Heyden; E Schäfer; P Jecker; J Gosepath; W J Mann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  A prospective, randomized, single-blind study comparing coblation and monopolar extracapsular tonsillectomy.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou; Zihan Lou; Tian Lv; Zhengnong Chen
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-03-29

Review 5.  [An update on tonsillotomy studies].

Authors:  J P Windfuhr; K Savva
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Clinical practice guideline: tonsillitis II. Surgical management.

Authors:  Jochen P Windfuhr; Nicole Toepfner; Gregor Steffen; Frank Waldfahrer; Reinhard Berner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Randomized controlled study between suture ligation and radio wave ablation and suture ligation of grade III symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  P J Gupta; P S Heda; S Kalaskar
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-09-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  Tonsillotomy: facts and fiction.

Authors:  J P Windfuhr; K Savva; J D Dahm; J A Werner
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  Hemorrhage rate after coblation tonsillectomy: a meta-analysis of published trials.

Authors:  Ralph Mösges; Martin Hellmich; Silke Allekotte; Kerstin Albrecht; Myriam Böhm
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 2.503

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.