Literature DB >> 16024492

Acute air pollution effects: consequences of exposure distribution and measurements.

Lianne Sheppard1.   

Abstract

Acute effect air pollution studies estimate the effect of short-term change in exposure on a health outcome. The two designs most commonly used in air pollution epidemiology are panel studies and time-series studies. Typically, both designs rely on ambient concentration measurements and not the personal exposures of individuals. This article discusses how panel studies and time-series studies are related and reviews the use of ambient concentrations versus personal exposure measurements in the analyses. This work suggests that for estimating acute effects, ambient concentration measurements are quite adequate in time-series studies. In addition, time-series studies have ample power relative to panel studies, in spite of the ecologic nature of their design. Panel studies have the benefit of being able to use all the information from personal exposures in the analysis, but they are much more costly and difficult to conduct. Furthermore, nontraditional panel studies, where multiple repeat panels are followed over time, require additional considerations in the analysis.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16024492     DOI: 10.1080/15287390590935987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  6 in total

1.  Time series analysis of personal exposure to ambient air pollution and mortality using an exposure simulator.

Authors:  Howard H Chang; Montserrat Fuentes; H Christopher Frey
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 5.563

2.  Estimating the acute health effects of coarse particulate matter accounting for exposure measurement error.

Authors:  Howard H Chang; Roger D Peng; Francesca Dominici
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-02-05       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Acute symptoms related to air pollution in urban areas: a study protocol.

Authors:  Masud Yunesian; Fariba Asghari; Javad Homayoun Vash; Mohammad Hossein Forouzanfar; Dariush Farhud
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-08-25       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  A conditional expectation approach for associating ambient air pollutant exposures with health outcomes.

Authors:  Kathleen A Wannemuehler; Robert H Lyles; Lance A Waller; Robert M Hoekstra; Mitchel Klein; Paige Tolbert
Journal:  Environmetrics       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Comparison of oxidative properties, light absorbance, total and elemental mass concentration of ambient PM2.5 collected at 20 European sites.

Authors:  Nino Künzli; Ian S Mudway; Thomas Götschi; Tingming Shi; Frank J Kelly; Sarah Cook; Peter Burney; Bertil Forsberg; James W Gauderman; Marianne E Hazenkamp; Joachim Heinrich; Deborah Jarvis; Dan Norbäck; Felix Payo-Losa; Albino Poli; Jordi Sunyer; Paul J A Borm
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Exposure measurement error in PM2.5 health effects studies: a pooled analysis of eight personal exposure validation studies.

Authors:  Marianthi-Anna Kioumourtzoglou; Donna Spiegelman; Adam A Szpiro; Lianne Sheppard; Joel D Kaufman; Jeff D Yanosky; Ronald Williams; Francine Laden; Biling Hong; Helen Suh
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 5.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.