Literature DB >> 16024370

Adaptive differences in response to two types of parental alarm call in altricial nestlings.

Dirk Platzen1, Robert D Magrath.   

Abstract

Vertebrate alarm calls can contain information about the type of predator and the degree of danger, but young animals often respond to alarm calls differently from adults. The distinct behaviour of young may reflect an imperfect stage in the gradual development of the adult response, or a response adapted to specific risks faced by young. In this study, we tested whether nestling white-browed scrubwrens, Sericornis frontalis, responded to different alarm calls according to their specific risks of predation. As predators on the ground pose a danger to scrubwren nestlings, whereas flying predators do not, we predicted that they would respond to ground alarm calls but not to aerial alarm calls. In a field playback experiment, we tested the response of young to aerial and ground alarm calls, each presented in a shorter (less urgent) and longer (more urgent) form. We found that both 5- and 11-day-old nestlings responded to ground alarm calls, and did so more strongly to the more urgent playback. By contrast, the response to aerial alarm calls started to develop only towards the end of the nestling stage. Thus, scrubwren nestlings can distinguish between different types of alarm calls and react more strongly to calls warning of a predator posing greater danger, appropriate to the nestling stage of development. Furthermore, they use the length of ground alarm calls as an indicator of the degree of danger.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16024370      PMCID: PMC1559813          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  [Increasing selectivity of defense behavior during development of pied flycatcher nestlings].

Authors:  L I Aleksandrov; E V Korneeva; T B Golubeva
Journal:  Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.437

2.  Learning fine-tunes a specific response of nestlings to the parental alarm calls of their own species.

Authors:  N B Davies; J R Madden; S H M Butchart
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Age differences in the response of California ground Squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi) to avian and mammalian predators.

Authors:  M T Hanson; R G Coss
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Brain-stem evoked responses as an index of hearing thresholds in one-day-chicks and ducklings.

Authors:  J C Saunders; G R Gates; R B Coles
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1974-03

5.  Age differences and developmental trends in alarm peep responses by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus).

Authors:  B McCowan; N V Franceschini; G A Vicino
Journal:  Am J Primatol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.371

6.  Heart rate response in great tit nestlings (Parus major) to an alarm call.

Authors:  O O Rydén
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1980-06

7.  Alarm call responsivity of mallard ducklings: III. Acoustic features affecting behavioral inhibition.

Authors:  D B Miller; C F Blaich
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 3.038

8.  Early auditory experience and the ontogeny of alarm-call discrimination in Belding's ground squirrels (Spermophilus beldingi).

Authors:  J M Mateo
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 2.231

9.  Parental alarm calls suppress nestling vocalization.

Authors:  Dirk Platzen; Robert D Magrath
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Development of stress response in nestling pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Vallo Tilgar; Pauli Saag; Kadri Moks
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Mechanisms of recognition in birds and social Hymenoptera: from detection to information processing.

Authors:  Natacha Rossi; Sébastien Derégnaucourt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  From nestling calls to fledgling silence: adaptive timing of change in response to aerial alarm calls.

Authors:  Robert D Magrath; Dirk Platzen; Junko Kondo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Asymmetrical stimulus generalization following differential fear conditioning.

Authors:  Sun Jung Bang; Timothy A Allen; Lauren K Jones; Pawel Boguszewski; Thomas H Brown
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 2.877

5.  Assessment of predation risk through referential communication in incubating birds.

Authors:  Toshitaka N Suzuki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Nestlings reduce their predation risk by attending to predator-information encoded within conspecific alarm calls.

Authors:  Ahmad Barati; Paul G McDonald
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Variation in alarm calls during different breeding stages of the common kestrel (Falco tinnunculus).

Authors:  Xiaona Huo; Lei Zhou; Jiang Feng; Hui Wu
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Anti-Predation Responses to Conspecific versus Heterospecific Alarm Calls by the Nestlings of Two Sympatric Birds.

Authors:  Yuxin Jiang; Jingru Han; Canchao Yang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.231

9.  Heterospecific eavesdropping on an anti-parasitic referential alarm call.

Authors:  Shelby L Lawson; Janice K Enos; Niko C Mendes; Sharon A Gill; Mark E Hauber
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.