Literature DB >> 16023336

A new BAL fluid instillation and aspiration technique: a multicenter randomized study.

Antoni Rosell1, Antoni Xaubet, Carles Agustí, Joan Castella, Carmen Puzo, Víctor Curull, Javier de Gracia.   

Abstract

Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a widely used clinical and research tool even though certain steps in the procedure have not been standarized. One step that is subject to variation is the technique used to instill and recover BAL fluid. Our aim was to assess whether attaching a plastic tube between the syringe and the working channel of the flexible bronchoscope allowed recovery of more fluid in comparison with recovery using only a syringe, and whether tubing had a favorable impact on diagnostic yield and complications. A randomized multicenter study was performed in eleven public hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). Patients scheduled for BAL were randomly assigned to tubing (n=140) or no-tubing groups (n=155). Flexible bronchoscopy and a 150 mL BAL in three 50 mL aliquots with or without tubing attached to the syringe. In the group with tubing, 8% more fluid was recovered. The difference was both statistically significant and clinically relevant given that 17.4% more diagnoses, 6.9% fewer complications, and 8.8% fewer technical failures were recorded. Based on these results, we recommend performing BAL using plastic tubing between the 50 mL syringe and the working channel of the flexible bronchoscope when carrying out manual instillation and suction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023336     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2005.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of two aspiration techniques of bronchoalveolar lavage in children.

Authors:  Christian Rosas-Salazar; Stephen A Walczak; Daniel G Winger; Geoffrey Kurland; Jonathan E Spahr
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  2013-10-24

2.  Performance of a standardized bronchoalveolar lavage protocol in a comprehensive cancer center: a prospective 2-year study.

Authors:  Fotis Sampsonas; Dimitrios P Kontoyiannis; Burton F Dickey; Scott E Evans
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-18       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Association between oxygen saturation level during bronchoscopy and post-bronchoscopy adverse events: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Hyo Jin Lee; Jung Kyu Lee; Tae Yeon Park; Eun Young Heo; Deog Kyeom Kim; Hee Soon Chung; Hyun Woo Lee
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  Modification of a common BAL technique to enhance sample diagnostic value.

Authors:  Morgan L Singletary; Kathrine M Phillippi-Falkenstein; Elizabeth Scanlon; Rudolf P Bohm; Ronald S Veazey; Amy F Gill
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 5.  Complications and discomfort of bronchoscopy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elise Orvedal Leiten; Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen; Per Sigvald Bakke; Tomas Mikal Lind Eagan; Rune Grønseth
Journal:  Eur Clin Respir J       Date:  2016-11-11

6.  Comparison of manual and suction pump aspiration techniques for performing bronchoalveolar lavage in 18 dogs with respiratory tract disease.

Authors:  K S Woods; A M N Defarges; A C G Abrams-Ogg; L Viel; B A Brisson; D Bienzle
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 3.333

7.  Complications and discomfort after research bronchoscopy in the MicroCOPD study.

Authors:  Elise Orvedal Leiten; Tomas Mikal Lind Eagan; Einar Marius Hjellestad Martinsen; Eli Nordeide; Gunnar Reksten Husebø; Kristel Svalland Knudsen; Sverre Lehmann; Øistein Svanes; Per Sigvald Bakke; Rune Nielsen
Journal:  BMJ Open Respir Res       Date:  2020-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.