Literature DB >> 16023253

The evolutionary dynamics of self-incompatibility systems.

Ed Newbigin1, Marcy K Uyenoyama.   

Abstract

Self-incompatible flowering plants reject pollen that expresses the same mating specificity as the pistil (female reproductive tract). In most plant families, pollen and pistil mating specificities segregate as a single locus, the S locus. In at least two self-incompatibility systems, distinct pollen and pistil specificity genes are embedded in an extensive nonrecombining tract. To facilitate consideration of how new S locus specificities arise in systems with distinct pollen and pistil genes, we present a graphical model for the generation of hypotheses. It incorporates the evolutionary principle that nonreciprocal siring success (cross-pollinations between two plants produce seeds in only one direction) tends to favor the rejecting partner. This model suggests that selection within S-allele specificity classes could accelerate the rate of nonsynonymous (amino acid-changing) substitutions, with periodic selective sweeps removing segregating variation within classes. Accelerated substitution within specificity classes could also promote the origin of new S-allele specificities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023253     DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN: 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  10 in total

1.  Genetic features of a pollen-part mutation suggest an inhibitory role for the Antirrhinum pollen self-incompatibility determinant.

Authors:  Yongbiao Xue; Yijing Zhang; Qiuying Yang; Qun Li; Zhukuan Cheng; Hugh G Dickinson
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.076

2.  Evolution of the S-locus region in Arabidopsis relatives.

Authors:  Ya-Long Guo; Xuan Zhao; Christa Lanz; Detlef Weigel
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  RNase-based self-incompatibility: puzzled by pollen S.

Authors:  Ed Newbigin; Timothy Paape; Joshua R Kohn
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 11.277

4.  The paradox of clonality and the evolution of self-incompatibility.

Authors:  Mario Vallejo-Marín
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2007-07

5.  S locus F-box brothers: multiple and pollen-specific F-box genes with S haplotype-specific polymorphisms in apple and Japanese pear.

Authors:  Hidenori Sassa; Hiroyuki Kakui; Mayu Miyamoto; Yusuke Suzuki; Toshio Hanada; Koichiro Ushijima; Makoto Kusaba; Hisashi Hirano; Takato Koba
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Evolutionary patterns at the RNase based gametophytic self - incompatibility system in two divergent Rosaceae groups (Maloideae and Prunus).

Authors:  Jorge Vieira; Pedro G Ferreira; Bruno Aguiar; Nuno A Fonseca; Cristina P Vieira
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-28       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  The effect of sheltered load on reproduction in Solanum carolinense, a species with variable self-incompatibility.

Authors:  Jorge I Mena-Alí; Lidewij H Keser; Andrew G Stephenson
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2009-01-06

Review 8.  Plant sexual reproduction during climate change: gene function in natura studied by ecological and evolutionary systems biology.

Authors:  Kentaro K Shimizu; Hiroshi Kudoh; Masaki J Kobayashi
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.357

9.  Inbreeding depression in Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae), a species with a plastic self-incompatibility response.

Authors:  Jorge I Mena-Ali; Lidewij H Keser; Andrew G Stephenson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Selection on Coding and Regulatory Variation Maintains Individuality in Major Urinary Protein Scent Marks in Wild Mice.

Authors:  Michael J Sheehan; Victoria Lee; Russell Corbett-Detig; Ke Bi; Robert J Beynon; Jane L Hurst; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.