Literature DB >> 16023170

The oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation and direction.

Xin Meng1, Ning Qian.   

Abstract

Observers can better discriminate orientation or direction near the cardinal axes than near an oblique axis. We investigated whether this well-known oblique effect is determined by the physical or the perceived axis of the stimuli. Using the simultaneous tilt illusion, we generated perceptually different orientations for the same inner (target) grating by contrasting it with differently oriented outer gratings. Subjects compared the target orientation with a set of reference orientations. If orientation discriminability was determined by the physical orientations, the psychometric curves for the same target grating would be identical. Instead, all subjects produced steeper curves when perceiving target gratings near vertically as opposed to more obliquely. This result of orientation discrimination was confirmed by using adaptation-generated tilt aftereffect to manipulate the perceived orientation of a given physical orientation. Moreover, we obtained the same result in direction discrimination by using motion repulsion to alter the perceived direction of a given physical direction. We conclude that when the perceived orientation or direction differs from the physical orientation or direction, the oblique effect depends on perceived, rather than physical, orientation or direction. Finally, as a by-product of the study, we found that, around the vertical direction, motion repulsion is much stronger when the inducing direction is more clockwise to the test direction than when it is more counterclockwise.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023170     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Effect of selective and distributed training on visual identification of orientation.

Authors:  Chantal Tschopp-Junker; Edouard Gentaz; Paolo Viviani
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visual perception as retrospective Bayesian decoding from high- to low-level features.

Authors:  Stephanie Ding; Christopher J Cueva; Misha Tsodyks; Ning Qian
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Quantifying "the aperture problem" for judgments of motion direction in natural scenes.

Authors:  David Kane; Peter Bex; Steven Dakin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The subconscious impact of line orientations in background images on memory of Chinese written characters.

Authors:  Yanqun Huang; Yi Zhang; Xu Li; Jie Zhang; Yuzhen Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  Dissociable perceptual effects of visual adaptation.

Authors:  Kai-Markus Müller; Frieder Schillinger; David H Do; David A Leopold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Mechanical and Anatomical Alignment Guide Techniques Are Superior to Freehand in Achieving Target Orientation of an Acetabular Component.

Authors:  Robert Bruce-Brand; Paul Magill; Christopher O'Neill; Paul Karayiannis; Janet Hill; David Beverland
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 7.  The haptic perception of spatial orientations.

Authors:  Edouard Gentaz; Gabriel Baud-Bovy; Marion Luyat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Exocentric pointing in the visual field.

Authors:  Andrea van Doorn; Jan Koenderink; Johan Wagemans
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-12-09
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.