Literature DB >> 16023098

Case-control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000-2003.

Lennart Hardell1, Michael Carlberg, Kjell Hansson Mild.   

Abstract

We performed a case-control study on the use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumors diagnosed during 2000-2003. We report the results for malignant brain tumors with data from 317 cases (88%) and 692 controls (84%). The use of analog cellular phones yielded odds ratio (OR) of 2.6 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.5-4.3, increasing to OR=3.5 and 95% CI=2.0-6.4 with a >10-year latency period. Regarding digital cellular telephones, the corresponding results were OR=1.9, 95% CI=1.3-2.7 and OR=3.6, 95% CI=1.7-7.5, respectively. Cordless telephones yielded OR=2.1, 95% CI=1.4-3.0, and with a >10-year latency period, OR=2.9, 95% CI=1.6-5.2. The OR increased with the cumulative number of hours of use and was highest for high-grade astrocytoma. A somewhat increased risk was also found for low-grade astrocytoma and other types of malignant brain tumors, although not significantly so. In multivariate analysis, all three phone types studied showed an increased risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023098     DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2005.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Res        ISSN: 0013-9351            Impact factor:   6.498


  18 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of carcinogenic effects of electromagnetic fields (EMF).

Authors:  Vahdettin Bayazit; Banu Bayram; Zeydin Pala; Ozkan Atan
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.363

2.  Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: results are difficult to interpret because of limitations.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Kjell Hansson Mild
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-29

3.  Pooled analysis of two case-control studies on use of cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for malignant brain tumours diagnosed in 1997-2003.

Authors:  Lennart Hardell; Michael Carlberg; Kjell Hansson Mild
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 4.  Cell phones and glioma risk: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Courtney Corle; Milan Makale; Santosh Kesari
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Evaluation of some physical hazards which may affect health in primary schools.

Authors:  Bilal Bakır; Mustafa Alparslan Babayiğit; Ömer Faruk Tekbaş; Recai Oğur; Abdullah Kılıç; Serdar Ulus
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2014-09-01

6.  Recall accuracy of mobile phone calls among Japanese young people.

Authors:  Kosuke Kiyohara; Kanako Wake; Soichi Watanabe; Takuji Arima; Yasuto Sato; Noriko Kojimahara; Masao Taki; Naohito Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 7.  Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes.

Authors:  Manya Prasad; Prachi Kathuria; Pallavi Nair; Amit Kumar; Kameshwar Prasad
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-02-17       Impact factor: 3.307

8.  Long-term recall accuracy for mobile phone calls in young Japanese people: A follow-up validation study using software-modified phones.

Authors:  Kosuke Kiyohara; Kanako Wake; Soichi Watanabe; Takuji Arima; Yasuto Sato; Noriko Kojimahara; Masao Taki; Elisabeth Cardis; Naohito Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 5.563

Review 9.  Environmental risk factors for brain tumors.

Authors:  Jennifer M Connelly; Mark G Malkin
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 10.  Environmental and occupational causes of cancer: new evidence 2005-2007.

Authors:  Richard W Clapp; Molly M Jacobs; Edward L Loechler
Journal:  Rev Environ Health       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.