Literature DB >> 16023039

Determinants of dominance: is language laterality explained by physical or linguistic features of speech?

Yury Shtyrov1, Elina Pihko, Friedemann Pulvermüller.   

Abstract

The nature of cerebral asymmetry of the language function is still not fully understood. Two main views are that laterality is best explained (1) by left cortical specialization for the processing of spectrally rich and rapidly changing sounds, and (2) by a predisposition of one hemisphere to develop a module for phonemes. We tested both of these views by investigating magnetic brain responses to the same brief acoustic stimulus, placed in contexts where it was perceived either as a noise burst with no resemblance of speech, or as a native language sound being part of a meaningless pseudoword. In further experiments, the same acoustic element was placed in the context of words. We found reliable left hemispheric dominance only when the sound was placed in word context. These results, obtained in a passive odd-ball paradigm, suggest that neither physical properties nor phoneme status of a sound are sufficient for laterality. In order to elicit left lateralized cortical activation in normal right-handed individuals, a rapidly changing spectrally rich sound with phoneme status needs to be placed in the context of frequently encountered larger language elements, such as words. This demonstrates that language laterality is bound to the processing of sounds as units of frequently occurring meaningful items and can thus be linked to the processes of learning and memory trace formation for such items rather than to their physical or phonological properties.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16023039     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  42 in total

1.  Neural correlates of the perception of contrastive prosodic focus in French: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti; Marion Dohen; Hélène Lœvenbruck; Marc Sato; Cédric Pichat; Monica Baciu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Emotional expressions in voice and music: same code, same effect?

Authors:  Nicolas Escoffier; Jidan Zhong; Annett Schirmer; Anqi Qiu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Opposite patterns of hemisphere dominance for early auditory processing of lexical tones and consonants.

Authors:  Hao Luo; Jing-Tian Ni; Zhi-Hao Li; Xiao-Ou Li; Da-Ren Zhang; Fan-Gang Zeng; Lin Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Martina Huss; Ferath Kherif; Fermin Moscoso del Prado Martin; Olaf Hauk; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural attunement processes in infants during the acquisition of a language-specific phonemic contrast.

Authors:  Yasuyo Minagawa-Kawai; Koichi Mori; Nozomi Naoi; Shozo Kojima
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies.

Authors:  Robert J Zatorre; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Objective phonological and subjective perceptual characteristics of syllables modulate spatiotemporal patterns of superior temporal gyrus activity.

Authors:  Richard E Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Thomas Witzel; Seppo P Ahlfors; Paul Swank; Jacqueline Liederman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Linear coding of voice onset time.

Authors:  Richard E Frye; Janet McGraw Fisher; Alexis Coty; Melissa Zarella; Jacqueline Liederman; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Executive control of spatial attention shifts in the auditory compared to the visual modality.

Authors:  Katrin Krumbholz; Esther A Nobis; Robert J Weatheritt; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Spatiotemporal signatures of large-scale synfire chains for speech processing as revealed by MEG.

Authors:  Friedemann Pulvermüller; Yury Shtyrov
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-05-05       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.