BACKGROUND: The efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unclear. METHODS: Patients with LCNEC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy were identified by reviewing 567 autopsied and 2790 surgically resected lung cancer patients. The clinical characteristics and objective responses to chemotherapy in these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 20 cases of LCNEC were identified, including stage IIIA (n=3), stage IIIB (n=6), stage IV (n=6) and postoperative recurrence (n=5) cases. Six patients had received prior chemotherapy, and 14 were chemo-naive patients. The patients had received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide (n=9), cisplatin, vindesine and mitomycin (n=6), cisplatin and vindesine (n=4), or cisplatin alone (n=1). One patient showed complete response and nine showed partial response, yielding an objective response rate of 50%. The response rate did not differ between patients with the initial diagnosis of SCLC and those with the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, however, the response rate in chemo-naive patients (64%) was significantly different from that in previously treated patients (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the response rate of LCNEC to cisplatin-based chemotherapy was comparable to that of SCLC.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung (LCNEC) remains unclear. METHODS:Patients with LCNEC who received cisplatin-based chemotherapy were identified by reviewing 567 autopsied and 2790 surgically resected lung cancerpatients. The clinical characteristics and objective responses to chemotherapy in these patients were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 20 cases of LCNEC were identified, including stage IIIA (n=3), stage IIIB (n=6), stage IV (n=6) and postoperative recurrence (n=5) cases. Six patients had received prior chemotherapy, and 14 were chemo-naive patients. The patients had received a combination of cisplatin and etoposide (n=9), cisplatin, vindesine and mitomycin (n=6), cisplatin and vindesine (n=4), or cisplatin alone (n=1). One patient showed complete response and nine showed partial response, yielding an objective response rate of 50%. The response rate did not differ between patients with the initial diagnosis of SCLC and those with the initial diagnosis of NSCLC, however, the response rate in chemo-naive patients (64%) was significantly different from that in previously treated patients (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the response rate of LCNEC to cisplatin-based chemotherapy was comparable to that of SCLC.
Authors: Jarushka Naidoo; Maria L Santos-Zabala; Tunc Iyriboz; Kaitlin M Woo; Camelia S Sima; John J Fiore; Mark G Kris; Gregory J Riely; Piro Lito; Afsheen Iqbal; Stephen Veach; Stephanie Smith-Marrone; Inderpal S Sarkaria; Lee M Krug; Charles M Rudin; William D Travis; Natasha Rekhtman; Maria C Pietanza Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 4.785