Literature DB >> 16022055

An application of structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery.

Frans J Oort1, Mechteld R M Visser, Mirjam A G Sprangers.   

Abstract

The objective is to show how structural equation modeling can be used to detect reconceptualization, reprioritization, and recalibration response shifts in quality of life data from cancer patients undergoing invasive surgery. A consecutive series of 170 newly diagnosed cancer patients, heterogeneous to cancer site, were included. Patients were administered the SF-36 and a short version of the multidimensional fatigue inventory prior to surgery, and 3 months following surgery. Indications of response shift effects were found for five SF-36 scales: reconceptualization of 'general health', reprioritization of 'social functioning', and recalibration of 'role-physical', 'bodily pain', and 'vitality'. Accounting for these response shifts, we found deteriorated physical health, deteriorated general fitness, and improved mental health. The sizes of the response shift effects on observed change were only small. Yet, accounting for the recalibration response shifts did change the estimate of true change in physical health from medium to large. The structural equation modeling approach was found to be useful in detecting response shift effects. The extent to which the procedure is guided by subjective decisions is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16022055     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-004-0831-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  7 in total

1.  Methodological approaches for assessing response shift in longitudinal health-related quality-of-life research.

Authors:  C E Schwartz; M A Sprangers
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model.

Authors:  M A Sprangers; C E Schwartz
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Single Sample Cross-Validation Indices for Covariance Structures.

Authors:  M W Browne; R Cudeck
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change.

Authors:  Frans J Oort
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study.

Authors:  Mechteld R M Visser; Frans J Oort; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Translation, validation, and norming of the Dutch language version of the SF-36 Health Survey in community and chronic disease populations.

Authors:  N K Aaronson; M Muller; P D Cohen; M L Essink-Bot; M Fekkes; R Sanderman; M A Sprangers; A te Velde; E Verrips
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) psychometric qualities of an instrument to assess fatigue.

Authors:  E M Smets; B Garssen; B Bonke; J C De Haes
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.006

  7 in total
  62 in total

1.  Determining clinically important differences in health-related quality of life in older patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy or surgery.

Authors:  C Quinten; C Kenis; L Decoster; P R Debruyne; I De Groof; C Focan; F Cornelis; V Verschaeve; C Bachmann; D Bron; S Luce; G Debugne; H Van den Bulck; J C Goeminne; A Baitar; K Geboers; B Petit; C Langenaeken; R Van Rijswijk; P Specenier; G Jerusalem; J P Praet; K Vandenborre; M Lycke; J Flamaing; K Milisen; J P Lobelle; H Wildiers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Response shift effects on measuring post-operative quality of life among breast cancer patients: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  T S Dabakuyo; F Guillemin; T Conroy; M Velten; D Jolly; M Mercier; S Causeret; J Cuisenier; O Graesslin; M Gauthier; F Bonnetain
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  An opportunity to refine our understanding of "response shift" and to educate researchers on designing quality research studies: response to Ubel, Peeters, and Smith.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  On the validity of measuring change over time in routine clinical assessment: a close examination of item-level response shifts in psychosomatic inpatients.

Authors:  S Nolte; A Mierke; H F Fischer; M Rose
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Structural equation models for quality of life response shifts: promises and pitfalls.

Authors:  Gary W Donaldson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  Using structural equation modeling to detect response shifts and true change.

Authors:  Frans J Oort
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Methods to detect response shift in quality of life data: a convergent validity study.

Authors:  Mechteld R M Visser; Frans J Oort; Mirjam A G Sprangers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schwartz; Rita Bode; Nicholas Repucci; Janine Becker; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Peter M Fayers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Response shift: a brief overview and proposed research priorities.

Authors:  Ruth Barclay-Goddard; Joshua D Epstein; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Identifying response shift statistically at the individual level.

Authors:  Nancy E Mayo; Susan C Scott; Nandini Dendukuri; Sara Ahmed; Sharon Wood-Dauphinee
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.