BACKGROUND: In geriatric psychiatry assessment scales are often used in clinical praxis in the diagnostic work-up of mental disorders. AIM: To assess whether the state part of the STAI is useful as a case-finding instrument of mental disorders. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Data came from 70 non demented geriatric in-patients in stable clinical condition. Mean age was 83.3 years (range 64-96), and 74.3% were women. The 20-item STAI state instrument was used to measure current anxiety symptoms. Without knowledge of the score on STAI state a psychiatrist examined all patients and set diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, but hierarchical rules were not used. Sensitivity, specificity, Likelihood ratio and accuracy were calculated for different cut-points of the mean sumscore on the STAI state. RESULTS: 15.7% of the participants suffered from a mental disorder: GAD = 1, mixed anxiety-depression = 5, depression = 1, dysthymic = 1, adjustment disorder (mixed anxiety-depression) = 1, and personality disorder = 1. The mean STAI sumscore in this group was 56.3 compared with 39.2 in the 59 patients without any psychiatric diagnosis. The optimal cut-off score on the STAI mean sumscore corresponding to the highest accuracy of 0.87 was 55/54 with sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.88, and LR + 6.8. CONCLUSION: The STAI state scale is a useful instrument for detecting a variety of mental disorders in older people. Further studies should be carried out in different populations. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
BACKGROUND: In geriatric psychiatry assessment scales are often used in clinical praxis in the diagnostic work-up of mental disorders. AIM: To assess whether the state part of the STAI is useful as a case-finding instrument of mental disorders. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Data came from 70 non demented geriatric in-patients in stable clinical condition. Mean age was 83.3 years (range 64-96), and 74.3% were women. The 20-item STAI state instrument was used to measure current anxiety symptoms. Without knowledge of the score on STAI state a psychiatrist examined all patients and set diagnosis according to DSM-IV-TR criteria, but hierarchical rules were not used. Sensitivity, specificity, Likelihood ratio and accuracy were calculated for different cut-points of the mean sumscore on the STAI state. RESULTS: 15.7% of the participants suffered from a mental disorder: GAD = 1, mixed anxiety-depression = 5, depression = 1, dysthymic = 1, adjustment disorder (mixed anxiety-depression) = 1, and personality disorder = 1. The mean STAI sumscore in this group was 56.3 compared with 39.2 in the 59 patients without any psychiatric diagnosis. The optimal cut-off score on the STAI mean sumscore corresponding to the highest accuracy of 0.87 was 55/54 with sensitivity 0.82, specificity 0.88, and LR + 6.8. CONCLUSION: The STAI state scale is a useful instrument for detecting a variety of mental disorders in older people. Further studies should be carried out in different populations. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Kara Bradford; Wendy Shih; Elizabeth J Videlock; Angela P Presson; Bruce D Naliboff; Emeran A Mayer; Lin Chang Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2011-12-16 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Frans J Cronjé; Levenda S Sommers; James K Faulkner; W A J Meintjes; Charles H Van Wijk; Robert P Turner Journal: J Relig Health Date: 2017-02
Authors: Angela K Lawson; Susan C Klock; Mary Ellen Pavone; Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron; Kristin N Smith; Ralph R Kazer Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2014-08-22 Impact factor: 7.329
Authors: Kendra R Becker; Ani C Keshishian; Rachel E Liebman; Kathryn A Coniglio; Shirley B Wang; Debra L Franko; Kamryn T Eddy; Jennifer J Thomas Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2018-12-22 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Matthew Swan; Nancy Doan; Robert A Ortega; Matthew Barrett; William Nichols; Laurie Ozelius; Jeannie Soto-Valencia; Sarah Boschung; Andres Deik; Harini Sarva; Jose Cabassa; Brooke Johannes; Deborah Raymond; Karen Marder; Nir Giladi; Joan Miravite; William Severt; Rivka Sachdev; Vicki Shanker; Susan Bressman; Rachel Saunders-Pullman Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2016-08-30 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Christina S McCrae; Ashley F Curtis; Jacob M Williams; Natalie D Dautovich; Joseph P H McNamara; Ashley Stripling; Joseph M Dzierzewski; Wai Sze Chan; Richard B Berry; Karin J M McCoy; Michael Marsiske Journal: Sleep Med Date: 2018-06-02 Impact factor: 3.492
Authors: Janine Thome; Maria Densmore; Paul A Frewen; Margaret C McKinnon; Jean Théberge; Andrew A Nicholson; Julian Koenig; Julian F Thayer; Ruth A Lanius Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Anita R Peoples; Peter W Bushunow; Sheila N Garland; Charles E Heckler; Joseph A Roscoe; Luke L Peppone; Deborah J Dudgeon; Jeffrey J Kirshner; Tarit K Banerjee; Judith O Hopkins; Shaker R Dakhil; Marie A Flannery; Gary R Morrow Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2015-09-02 Impact factor: 3.603