Literature DB >> 16021434

Age-related changes in smooth pursuit initiation.

Paul C Knox1, Jillian H Davidson, David Anderson.   

Abstract

Quantitative analysis of eye movements is a useful tool for examining the behavioural effects of ageing. Although the effect of ageing on saccadic eye movement has been examined in some detail, the effect of ageing on a second class of eye movement, smooth pursuit (SP), has received less attention. We examined the initiation of SP in a group of fifteen healthy older people (mean age 72 years) and compared their performance with that of ten young controls (mean age 21 years). Although their performance was qualitatively similar, pursuit latency was increased in the older group. Investigation of the gap effect on pursuit revealed that, while the gap effect was present in the older group, it seemed to be directionally asymmetrical. When the longer absolute latencies were taken into account, although the gap effect in the two groups was identical for leftward tasks, for rightward tasks it was reduced in the older group, although this did not reach statistical significance. The difference between the old and young groups was driven by some of the older subjects. At the longest gap duration employed (400 ms), while there was a clear gap effect for leftward tasks in these subjects, there was no reduction in latency, or increases in latency, for rightward tasks. This asymmetry was not related to chronological age within the older group. These results suggest an age-related alteration in SP initiation that is more complex than general slowing of information processing in ageing. They may be indicative of additional ageing effects specific to the oculomotor or closely related systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16021434     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2265-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Functional neuroanatomy of smooth pursuit and predictive saccades.

Authors:  G A O'Driscoll; A L Wolff; C Benkelfat; P S Florencio; S Lal; A C Evans
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-04-27       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 2.  Tracking with the mind's eye.

Authors:  R J Krauzlis; L S Stone
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 13.837

3.  Pursuit subregion of the frontal eye field projects to the caudate nucleus in monkeys.

Authors:  Dong-Mei Cui; Yi-Jun Yan; James C Lynch
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Commentary: eye movement research with clinical populations.

Authors:  John A Sweeney; Deborah Levy; Margret S H Harris
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.453

5.  The relationship between saccadic and smooth tracking eye movements.

Authors:  C RASHBASS
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1961-12       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Generation of smooth-pursuit eye movements: neuronal mechanisms and pathways.

Authors:  E L Keller; S J Heinen
Journal:  Neurosci Res       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.304

7.  Initiation and inhibition of saccadic eye movements in younger and older adults: an analysis of the gap effect.

Authors:  J Pratt; R A Abrams; A L Chasteen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 4.077

8.  The effect of the gap paradigm on the latency of human smooth pursuit of eye movement.

Authors:  P C Knox
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-11-25       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Effect of aging on horizontal smooth pursuit.

Authors:  J A Sharpe; T O Sylvester
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Effects of components of displacement-step stimuli upon latency for saccadic eye movement.

Authors:  M G Saslow
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1967-08
View more
  6 in total

1.  Sustained effects for training of smooth pursuit plasticity.

Authors:  Karin Eibenberger; Michael Ring; Thomas Haslwanter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Normal aging affects movement execution but not visual motion working memory and decision-making delay during cue-dependent memory-based smooth-pursuit.

Authors:  Kikuro Fukushima; Graham R Barnes; Norie Ito; Peter M Olley; Tateo Warabi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Aging does not affect integration times for the perception of depth from motion parallax.

Authors:  Jessica Holmin; Mark Nawrot
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Loss of audiovisual facilitation with age occurs for vergence eye movements but not for saccades.

Authors:  Martin Chavant; Zoï Kapoula
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Self-motion perception in the elderly.

Authors:  Matthias Lich; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Eye Movements Affect Postural Control in Young and Older Females.

Authors:  Neil M Thomas; Theodoros M Bampouras; Tim Donovan; Susan Dewhurst
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 5.750

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.