BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion-diffusion (PWI-DWI) mismatch may represent the ischemic penumbra. The complexities associated with perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) have restricted its use. Mismatch between stroke severity, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the volume of the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (clinical-diffusion mismatch; CDM) has been suggested as a surrogate for PWI-DWI mismatch. We compared CDM with PWI and DWI in acute stroke. METHODS: Seventy-nine hemispheric stroke patients were imaged within 24 hours of symptom onset and subacutely (3 to 5 days). CDM was defined as NIHSS > or =8 and DWI < or =25 mL. DWI lesion and PWI (Tmax+4s) volumes were measured by planimetric techniques. Acute PWI-DWI mismatch was examined as a continuous variable (mismatch volume=PWIvol-DWIvol) and a categorical variable (mismatch=PWIvol-DWIvol/DWIvol x 100>20%). Early infarct expansion was calculated as DWI(subacute vol/DWI(acute vol). RESULTS: In the 54 sub-6-hour patients, CDM detected PWI-DWI mismatch with a specificity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 99%), a positive predictive value of 95% (95% CI, 77% to 100%), but a sensitivity of only 53% (95% CI, 34% to 68%). Alternate DWI and NIHSS cutpoints did not improve test performance characteristics. In addition, subacute DWI expansion was significantly greater in patients with CDM (P=0.01) compared with those without. CONCLUSIONS: CDM (NIH > or =8, DWI < or =25 mL) predicts the presence of PWI-DWI mismatch with high specificity and low sensitivity. CDM also predicts DWI expansion. CDM may be a useful selection tool in acute stroke therapies, including thrombolysis.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion-diffusion (PWI-DWI) mismatch may represent the ischemic penumbra. The complexities associated with perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) have restricted its use. Mismatch between stroke severity, assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and the volume of the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) lesion (clinical-diffusion mismatch; CDM) has been suggested as a surrogate for PWI-DWI mismatch. We compared CDM with PWI and DWI in acute stroke. METHODS: Seventy-nine hemispheric strokepatients were imaged within 24 hours of symptom onset and subacutely (3 to 5 days). CDM was defined as NIHSS > or =8 and DWI < or =25 mL. DWI lesion and PWI (Tmax+4s) volumes were measured by planimetric techniques. Acute PWI-DWI mismatch was examined as a continuous variable (mismatch volume=PWIvol-DWIvol) and a categorical variable (mismatch=PWIvol-DWIvol/DWIvol x 100>20%). Early infarct expansion was calculated as DWI(subacute vol/DWI(acute vol). RESULTS: In the 54 sub-6-hour patients, CDM detected PWI-DWI mismatch with a specificity of 93% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 99%), a positive predictive value of 95% (95% CI, 77% to 100%), but a sensitivity of only 53% (95% CI, 34% to 68%). Alternate DWI and NIHSS cutpoints did not improve test performance characteristics. In addition, subacute DWI expansion was significantly greater in patients with CDM (P=0.01) compared with those without. CONCLUSIONS:CDM (NIH > or =8, DWI < or =25 mL) predicts the presence of PWI-DWI mismatch with high specificity and low sensitivity. CDM also predicts DWI expansion. CDM may be a useful selection tool in acute stroke therapies, including thrombolysis.
Authors: Bruce C V Campbell; Archana Purushotham; Soren Christensen; Patricia M Desmond; Yoshinari Nagakane; Mark W Parsons; Maarten G Lansberg; Michael Mlynash; Matus Straka; Deidre A De Silva; Jean-Marc Olivot; Roland Bammer; Gregory W Albers; Geoffrey A Donnan; Stephen M Davis Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2011-07-20 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Yuko Y Palesch; Sharon D Yeatts; Thomas A Tomsick; Lydia D Foster; Andrew M Demchuk; Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Bernard Yan; Rüdiger von Kummer; Carlos A Molina; Mayank Goyal; Wouter J Schonewille; Mikael Mazighi; Stefan T Engelter; Craig Anderson; Judith Spilker; Janice Carrozzella; Karla J Ryckborst; L Scott Janis; Annie Simpson; Kit N Simpson; Joseph P Broderick Journal: Stroke Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Vincent N Thijs; Scott Hamilton; Gottfried Schlaug; Roland Bammer; Stephanie Kemp; Gregory W Albers Journal: Stroke Date: 2007-05-10 Impact factor: 7.914