Literature DB >> 16020572

Evaluating clinical decision rules.

Susan E Shapiro1.   

Abstract

Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are decision support tools that synthesize evidence into bedside tools for practice. Before adopting CDRs into practice, nurses must be assured that there is sufficient evidence in the literature that the rule performs as expected, can do so in a variety of settings (especially in settings similar to one's own), and that using it will likely result in improved patient outcomes at no additional cost (or conversely, that it will lower costs with no adverse effect on clinical outcomes). This article provides a framework for clinical nurses to evaluate CDRs. The framework focuses on the processes used to establish the external validity of the rule, and the evidence that using the rule results in improved patient or systems outcomes, including cost-effectiveness. The Braden Scale is used as an example and is evaluated using the framework described.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16020572     DOI: 10.1177/0193945905276441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Nurs Res        ISSN: 0193-9459            Impact factor:   1.967


  3 in total

1.  Validating Performance of a Hospital Discharge Planning Decision Tool in Community Hospitals.

Authors:  Diane E Holland; Cheryl Brandt; Paul V Targonski; Kathryn H Bowles
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct

2.  Validating Performance of a Hospital Discharge Planning Decision Tool in Community Hospitals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prof Case Manag       Date:  2017 Sep/Oct

3.  Knowledge Translation Tools are Emerging to Move Neck Pain Research into Practice.

Authors:  Joy C Macdermid; Jordan Miller; Anita R Gross
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.