Literature DB >> 16019925

Sex and tissue-specific differences in low-dose radiation-induced oncogenic signaling.

Jill Besplug1, Paula Burke, André Ponton, Jody Filkowski, Viktor Titov, Igor Kovalchuk, Olga Kovalchuk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The possible adverse health effects of low-dose radiation (LDR) exposure constitute a growing concern. Clinically and environmentally relevant exposures occur predominantly under chronic conditions, notwithstanding that most studies of LDR effects have been performed using a single acute exposure. Sex- and tissue-specificity of the LDR-induced changes have not been considered before. We investigated LDR-related expression patterns in muscle, liver and spleen of male and female mice subjected to acute and chronic LDR exposure. Genes involved in oncogenic signaling were of specific interest, as radiation is a well-known carcinogen.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the expression pattern of genes coding for growth factors and growth-factor receptors, cytoplasmic serine/threonine protein kinases, G-proteins and nuclear DNA-binding proteins, and other important components of oncogenic signaling.
RESULTS: We found sex- and tissue-specific changes in the expression of Ras superfamily members (Nras, Rab2, Rab34, Vav2), protein kinase C (PKC) isoforms (PKCbeta, PKCmu), AP-1 factor components (Jun, JunB and FosB), Wnt signaling pathway members as well as in a variety of other cellular proto-oncogenes and oncogenes. Importantly, Western blot analysis of JunB, PKCmu and Rab2 proteins supported the transcriptomic data.
CONCLUSIONS: Substantially different protein levels were observed in all three tissues (muscle, spleen and liver) of acutely and chronically irradiated female and male animals. Based on the obtained data and available literature, we discuss several possible mechanisms that may contribute to radiation-induced carcinogenesis in various tissues of males and females. From our results we could identify the genes that may serve as sex- and tissue-specific biomarkers of the LDR exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019925     DOI: 10.1080/09553000500103512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  7 in total

Review 1.  Sex-specific aspects of tumor therapy.

Authors:  Kerstin Borgmann; Ekkehard Dikomey; Cordula Petersen; Petra Feyer; Ulrike Hoeller
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Radiation induced bystander effects in mice given low doses of radiation in vivo.

Authors:  Harleen Singh; Rohin Saroya; Richard Smith; Rebecca Mantha; Lynda Guindon; Ron E J Mitchel; Colin Seymour; Carmel Mothersill
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: Cell communications and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-09-12

4.  Disruption of the circadian clock due to the Clock mutation has discrete effects on aging and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Marina P Antoch; Victoria Y Gorbacheva; Olena Vykhovanets; Illia A Toshkov; Roman V Kondratov; Anna A Kondratova; Choogon Lee; Alexander Yu Nikitin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Wnt inhibitory factor 1 is epigenetically silenced in human osteosarcoma, and targeted disruption accelerates osteosarcomagenesis in mice.

Authors:  Maya Kansara; Michael Tsang; Laurent Kodjabachian; Natalie A Sims; Melanie K Trivett; Mathias Ehrich; Alexander Dobrovic; John Slavin; Peter F M Choong; Paul J Simmons; Igor B Dawid; David M Thomas
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Integrated molecular analysis indicates undetectable change in DNA damage in mice after continuous irradiation at ~ 400-fold natural background radiation.

Authors:  Werner Olipitz; Dominika Wiktor-Brown; Joe Shuga; Bo Pang; Jose McFaline; Pallavi Lonkar; Aline Thomas; James T Mutamba; Joel S Greenberger; Leona D Samson; Peter C Dedon; Jacquelyn C Yanch; Bevin P Engelward
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  Bystander communication and cell cycle decisions after DNA damage.

Authors:  Himjyot Jaiswal; Arne Lindqvist
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.599

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.