Literature DB >> 16019777

Complex syntax acquisition: a longitudinal case study of a child with specific language impairment.

Melanie C Schuele1, Julianna C Dykes.   

Abstract

Although there is extensive documentation of the morphological limitations of children with specific language impairment (SLI), few studies have reported on complex syntax acquisition in children with SLI. This case study examined the development of complex syntax in a child with SLI between 3 and 7 years. Twelve conversational samples were analysed to describe emergence of complex syntax types, proportional use of complex syntax, and complex syntax production errors. Earliest emerging complex syntax types were catenatives and let's clauses, not always considered true complex syntax, as well as simple infinitives. These three types accounted for 88% of complex syntax tokens through age 4;8 (MLU = 3.12). A diverse range of complex syntax types was produced consistently at age 5;9 (MLU = 4.27), including wh clausal complements, relative clauses, and full propositional clauses. Production errors on complex syntax included omissions of infinitival to, omissions of wh pronouns in wh clausal complements, omissions of obligatory relative markers, and an omission of a complementizer. Production errors continued to be prevalent even in the last language sample at 7;10 (MLU = 5.46). Documentation of complex syntax development in children with SLI is critical to the clarification of linguistic deficiencies that characterize specific language impairment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019777     DOI: 10.1080/02699200410001703709

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon        ISSN: 0269-9206            Impact factor:   1.346


  7 in total

1.  Effects of Specific Language Impairment on a Contrastive Dialect Structure: The Case of Infinitival TO Across Various Nonmainstream Dialects of English.

Authors:  Andrew M Rivière; Janna B Oetting; Joseph Roy
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Judgments of omitted BE and DO in questions as extended finiteness clinical markers of specific language impairment (SLI) to 15 years: a study of growth and asymptote.

Authors:  Mabel L Rice; Lesa Hoffman; Ken Wexler
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-09-28       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Input sources of third person singular -s inconsistency in children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Laurence B Leonard; Marc E Fey; Patricia Deevy; Shelley L Bredin-Oja
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2014-07-30

4.  The Production of Complex Syntax in Spontaneous Language by 4-Year-Old Children With Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Krystal L Werfel; Gabriella Reynolds; Sarah Hudgins; Marissa Castaldo; Emily A Lund
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  The Locus Preservation Hypothesis: Shared Linguistic Profiles across Developmental Disorders and the Resilient Part of the Human Language Faculty.

Authors:  Evelina Leivada; Maria Kambanaros; Kleanthes K Grohmann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-10-13

6.  Spontaneous productions of infinitive clauses by English-speaking children with and without specific language impairment.

Authors:  Amy Wilder; Sean Redmond
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 1.346

7.  Annoying Danish relatives: comprehension and production of relative clauses by Danish children with and without SLI.

Authors:  Kristine Jensen De López; Lone Sundahl Olsen; Vasiliki Chondrogianni
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2012-12-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.