Literature DB >> 16019647

The multi-source interference task: the effect of randomization.

John F Stins1, Wessel M A van Leeuwen, Eco J C de Geus.   

Abstract

Recently a novel interference task was developed, that was aimed at obtaining robust patterns of interference in individual subjects, both behaviorally and neurophysiologically (Bush, Shin, Holmes, Rosen & Vogt, 2003). This multi-source interference task (MSIT) combined elements of spatial and flanker interference, and huge interference effects were obtained in a blocked design. This task could thus in principle be used to assess frontal abnormalities, such as ADHD. In the present study, we further examined the nature of the MSIT. We examined the effect of randomization, and the relative contribution of each type of interference. Using a group of healthy subjects, we found a much smaller interference effect than Bush et al. (2003). In addition, we found that most of the interference could be ascribed to flanker interference, and much less to spatial interference. It seems to be the case that there is a trade-off between obtaining robust and reliable effects, and isolating a specific psychological process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019647     DOI: 10.1080/13803390490918516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  5 in total

1.  Posterior Alpha and Gamma Oscillations Index Divergent and Superadditive Effects of Cognitive Interference.

Authors:  Alex I Wiesman; Tony W Wilson
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Dynamic filtering improves attentional state prediction with fNIRS.

Authors:  Angela R Harrivel; Daniel H Weissman; Douglas C Noll; Theodore Huppert; Scott J Peltier
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Task-dependent recruitment of intrinsic brain networks reflects normative variance in cognition.

Authors:  Jennifer L Gess; Jennifer S Fausett; Tonisha E Kearney-Ramos; Clinton D Kilts; George Andrew James
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.708

4.  Effects of affective picture viewing on postural control.

Authors:  John F Stins; Peter J Beek
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 3.288

5.  Monitoring attentional state with fNIRS.

Authors:  Angela R Harrivel; Daniel H Weissman; Douglas C Noll; Scott J Peltier
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.