| Literature DB >> 16019382 |
M Olga García-Fernández1, Beatriz Collado, Guillermo Bodega, Joaquin Cortés, Antonio Ruíz-Villaespesa, Maria J Carmena, Juan Carlos Prieto.
Abstract
Vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) bind similarly to VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors, whereas PACAP binds with higher affinity than VIP to PAC1 receptors. Here we demonstrate by different approaches the expression of the three subclasses of PACAP/VIP receptors in human normal and malignant breast tissue. At the mRNA level, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction experiments showed VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors as well as various isoforms (null, hip/hop) of PAC1 receptors due to alternative splicing. At the protein level, Western blot experiments revealed the three subclasses of receptor although no conclusive differences could be established when comparing control, peritumoral and tumoral tissue samples. Immunohistochemistry showed the distribution of these receptors: they were located at epithelial cells in normal and cancer conditions but also in leukocytes at the stromal level in carcinomatous tissue. A weaker immunostaining of PAC1 receptors in normal tissue and a strong density of the three PACAP/VIP receptor subclasses in cancer tissue may be related to differential expression patterns during breast tumor progression but more samples need to be studied to validate this hypothesis. PAC1, VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors were functional, as shown by their coupling to adenylate cyclase stimulation: VIP, PACAP-27 and PACAP-38 behaved similarly at this level, whereas both VPAC receptors acted alike as shown by means of specific peptide agonists and antagonists. The present results together with the known presence of PACAP and VIP in the mammary gland support a paracrine/autocrine involvement of both peptides at this level in physiological and pathological conditions, i.e. during malignant transformation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16019382 DOI: 10.1080/09513590500098240
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gynecol Endocrinol ISSN: 0951-3590 Impact factor: 2.260