Literature DB >> 16019232

Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI.

Tor D Wager1, Ching-Yune C Sylvester, Steven C Lacey, Derek Evan Nee, Michael Franklin, John Jonides.   

Abstract

The ability to inhibit inappropriate responses is central to cognitive control, but whether the same brain mechanisms mediate inhibition across different tasks is not known. We present evidence for a common set of frontal and parietal regions engaged in response inhibition across three tasks: a go/no-go task, a flanker task, and a stimulus-response compatibility task. Regions included bilateral anterior insula/frontal operculum and anterior prefrontal, right dorsolateral and premotor, and parietal cortices. Insula activity was positively correlated with interference costs in behavioral performance in each task. Principal components analysis showed a coherent pattern of individual differences in these regions that was also positively correlated with performance in all three tasks. However, correlations among tasks were low, for both brain activity and performance. We suggest that common interference detection and/or resolution mechanisms are engaged across tasks, and that inter-task correlations in behavioral performance are low because they conflate measurements of common mechanisms with measurements of individual biases unique to each task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019232     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  181 in total

1.  Pinning down response inhibition in the brain--conjunction analyses of the Stop-signal task.

Authors:  C N Boehler; L G Appelbaum; R M Krebs; J M Hopf; M G Woldorff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  A meta-analysis of executive components of working memory.

Authors:  Derek Evan Nee; Joshua W Brown; Mary K Askren; Marc G Berman; Emre Demiralp; Adam Krawitz; John Jonides
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Performance Dip in motor response induced by task-irrelevant weaker coherent visual motion signals.

Authors:  Yuko Yotsumoto; Aaron R Seitz; Shinsuke Shimojo; Masamichi Sakagami; Takeo Watanabe; Yuka Sasaki
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Modality specific cerebro-cerebellar activations in verbal working memory: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Matthew P Kirschen; S H Annabel Chen; John E Desmond
Journal:  Behav Neurol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.342

5.  Absorbed in the task: Personality measures predict engagement during task performance as tracked by error negativity and asymmetrical frontal activity.

Authors:  Mattie Tops; Maarten A S Boksem
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Word and position interference in stroop tasks: a behavioral and fMRI study.

Authors:  Giada Zoccatelli; Alberto Beltramello; Franco Alessandrini; Francesca Benedetta Pizzini; Giancarlo Tassinari
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Cognitive Contributions to Freezing of Gait in Parkinson Disease: Implications for Physical Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Daniel S Peterson; Laurie A King; Rajal G Cohen; Fay B Horak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2015-09-17

8.  Reversing the Standard Neural Signature of the Word-Nonword Distinction.

Authors:  William W Graves; Olga Boukrina; Samantha R Mattheiss; Edward J Alexander; Sylvain Baillet
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Common prefrontal regions activate during self-control of craving, emotion, and motor impulses in smokers.

Authors:  Golnaz Tabibnia; J David Creswell; Thomas Kraynak; Cecilia Westbrook; Erica Julson; Hilary A Tindle
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-09

Review 10.  Factors modulating neural reactivity to drug cues in addiction: a survey of human neuroimaging studies.

Authors:  Agnes J Jasinska; Elliot A Stein; Jochen Kaiser; Marcus J Naumer; Yavor Yalachkov
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.