Literature DB >> 16018897

Quick determination of malodor-causing fatty acids in manure by capillary electrophoresis.

Fung-Hwa Chi1, Pearl Hsiu-Ping Lin, Min-Her Leu.   

Abstract

The analysis of odor components in livestock waste has been extensively studied. Past research has identified volatile fatty acids, especially from C3 to C6, as indicators of malodor. Originally, the odorous components were analyzed by gas chromatography after a tedious absorption and troublesome extraction procedure or by a subjectively olfactory system or sense of smell. Thus, there is a need for the development of highly specific, quantitative analytical methods. In this research, a comprehensive liquid manure analysis approach-capillary electrophoresis (CE) with a systematic optimization procedure-was adopted to measure the concentration of propanoic acid (C2H5COOH, C3), butyric acid (C3H7COOH, C4), valeric acid (C4H9COOH, C5) and caproic acid (C5H11COOH, C6) in swine manure. Liquid samples after filtration were injected into CE directly. The following condition is finally proposed: fused-silica capillary, effective length 40 cm, 50 microm I.D.; buffer, 20 mM Tris and 10 mM p-anisate, pH 8.0; voltage 30 kV; temperature 25 degrees C. The results showed that CE provided a quantitative analysis of volatile fatty acids in liquid manure at the ppm level with minimum sample needed (nanoliter). Moreover, the use of CE is a timesaving technique; one measurement for the separation of those VFAs could be completed within 10 min.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16018897     DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.01.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosphere        ISSN: 0045-6535            Impact factor:   7.086


  2 in total

1.  Application of headspace solid-phase microextraction followed by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to determine short-chain alkane monocarboxylic acids in aqueous samples.

Authors:  Anna Banel; Marta Wasielewska; Bogdan Zygmunt
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2010-11-25       Impact factor: 4.142

2.  Differences in carbon source utilisation distinguish Campylobacter jejuni from Campylobacter coli.

Authors:  Sariqa Wagley; Jane Newcombe; Emma Laing; Emmanuel Yusuf; Christine M Sambles; David J Studholme; Roberto M La Ragione; Richard W Titball; Olivia L Champion
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.605

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.