Literature DB >> 1601529

Bioequivalence studies: single vs multiple dose.

V W Steinijans1, R Sauter, J H Jonkman, H U Schulz, H Stricker, H Blume.   

Abstract

Bioequivalence of different preparations of the same drug substance has gained considerable importance over the last few years due to increasing generic substitution. The procedure that the manufacturer of the generic test preparation has to show bioequivalence with an appropriate reference preparation is scientifically accepted and laid down in international regulations. However, the necessity of single- vs multiple-dose bioequivalence studies has not been discussed in detail with the exception of the Dutch and US guidelines on sustained-release theophylline formulations, where multiple-dose studies are specifically required. This paper compares the conclusions drawn from single- and multiple-dose studies in the same subjects and recommends appropriate pharmacokinetic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1601529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol        ISSN: 0174-4879


  2 in total

1.  Why rate of absorption inferences in single dose bioequivalence studies are often inappropriate.

Authors:  R P Basson; A Ghosh; B J Cerimele; K A DeSante; D C Howey
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Current status of acid pump antagonists (reversible PPIs).

Authors:  W Wurst; M Hartmann
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.