Literature DB >> 16015235

Patient functional self-assessment in late glenoid component failure at three to eleven years after total shoulder arthroplasty.

Brian P Buckingham1, I M Parsons, Barry Campbell, Robert M Titelman, Kevin L Smith, Frederick A Matsen.   

Abstract

Failure of the glenoid component is the most common indication for late revision of a total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This is the first study to characterize the deterioration in patient self-assessment of shoulder function occurring with glenoid component failure at times remote from the index surgery. Of 115 total shoulders, 11 had revision by the original surgeon for isolated glenoid loosening. Simple Shoulder Test scores averaged 4.4 before TSA, rose to a mean of 11.3 after surgery, and fell to a mean of 4.6 before revision for glenoid loosening performed at a mean of 7 years after TSA. All shoulders showed a drop of at least 3 points between the peak Simple Shoulder Test score and the prerevision Simple Shoulder Test score. Periodic self-assessment of shoulder function may offer a method of screening patients for the possibility of late glenoid component failure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16015235     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  5 in total

1.  One and two-year clinical outcomes for a polyethylene glenoid with a fluted peg: one thousand two hundred seventy individual patients from eleven centers.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Joseph P Iannotti; R Sean Churchill; Lieven De Wilde; T Bradley Edwards; Matthew C Evans; Edward V Fehringer; Gordon I Groh; James D Kelly; Christopher M Kilian; Giovanni Merolla; Tom R Norris; Giuseppe Porcellini; Edwin E Spencer; Anne Vidil; Michael A Wirth; Stacy M Russ; Moni Neradilek; Jeremy S Somerson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Is there evidence that the outcomes of primary anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty are getting better?

Authors:  Jeremy S Somerson; Moni B Neradilek; Jason E Hsu; Benjamin C Service; Albert O Gee; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  What Factors are Predictive of Patient-reported Outcomes? A Prospective Study of 337 Shoulder Arthroplasties.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Stacy M Russ; Phuong T Vu; Jason E Hsu; Robert M Lucas; Bryan A Comstock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Relationship Between Glenoid Component Shift and Osteolysis After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Analysis.

Authors:  Eric T Ricchetti; Bong-Jae Jun; Yuxuan Jin; Jason C Ho; Thomas E Patterson; Jarrod E Dalton; Kathleen A Derwin; Joseph P Iannotti
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 6.558

5.  E-mail reminders improve completion rates of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Jacob J Triplet; Enesi Momoh; Jennifer Kurowicki; Leonardo D Villarroel; Tsun Yee Law; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2017-04-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.