Literature DB >> 16014118

Knowledge of cervical cancer and screening among women in east-central England.

Z Philips1, M Avis, D K Whynes.   

Abstract

This study assesses the extent and accuracy of women's knowledge of cervical cancer, risk factors, and the efficacy of the national screening program. Data were obtained from a questionnaire survey of randomly selected women eligible for screening, drawn from a population in east-central England. The majority of women in the sample overestimated the current incidence of cervical cancer, both absolutely and relative to other cancers. Perceiving incidence to be high was associated with reporting worries about the disease. With respect to the screening process, 78.3% believe that the smear abnormality rate is higher than it actually is, and only 7.6% correctly appreciate that the abnormality rate is highest at younger ages. With respect to performance, 16.3% believed the smear test to be completely accurate, and more than half overestimated the likely number of cancer cases prevented by screening. While certain cervical cancer risk factors were correctly assigned by the majority of women, undue emphasis was placed on genetic influence, while the risks posed by human papillomavirus infection were unfamiliar to almost half of the sample. We conclude that women typically possess only a partial picture of risk factors and overestimate both the incidence of cervical cancer and the efficacy of screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16014118     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00126.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  6 in total

1.  Assessing knowledge and attitudes towards screening among users of Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT).

Authors:  Maaike J Denters; Marije Deutekom; Marie-Louise Essink-Bot; Patrick M Bossuyt; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Cervical screening among migrant women: a qualitative study of Polish, Slovak and Romanian women in London, UK.

Authors:  Marta Jackowska; Christian von Wagner; Jane Wardle; Dorota Juszczyk; Aleksandra Luszczynska; Jo Waller
Journal:  J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care       Date:  2012-01-04

3.  How does HPV vaccination status relate to risk perceptions and intention to participate in cervical screening? a survey study.

Authors:  Mie Sara Hestbech; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Jakob Kragstrup; Volkert Siersma; John Brodersen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Effects of numerical information on intention to participate in cervical screening among women offered HPV vaccination: a randomised study.

Authors:  Mie Sara Hestbech; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Jakob Kragstrup; Volkert Siersma; John Brodersen
Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.581

5.  Men and women: beliefs about cancer and about screening.

Authors:  Tracey H Sach; David K Whynes
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Cancer screening in a middle-aged general population: factors associated with practices and attitudes.

Authors:  Stéphane Cullati; Agathe I Charvet-Bérard; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 3.295

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.