Literature DB >> 16014109

Arguments for a magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer.

K Narayan1.   

Abstract

FIGO staging of cervical cancer is based on anatomic compartmental spread of cervical cancer. This was necessary in the evaluation of surgical resectability in each patient. Even if the surgical resection was not deemed satisfactory, surgical findings and subsequent accurate anatomic pathology findings could be used to prescribe tailored adjuvant therapies. Recently, the management of cervical cancer has been influenced by the evidence from several surgical-pathologic studies and phase II and III combined modality treatment trials. However, the patient selection criteria used in these clinical studies were almost always refined by modern medical imaging and surgical techniques not prescribed in the FIGO staging system. The results obtained from these studies would not correlate with those from the patient population similarly treated but selected strictly along the FIGO staging criteria. This selective, heterogenous, and arbitrary refinement of FIGO staging has certainly given insight into cervical cancer biology but in the process has rendered the current FIGO staging of this disease quite inadequate. Prior knowledge of these factors through modern imaging in these patients could be used in staging and selecting the optimum treatment modality while minimizing the treatment-related morbidity. A magnetic resonance imaging-assisted FIGO staging system for cervical cancer as proposed here could be used for selecting patients appropriately for a given treatment package.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16014109     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2005.00128.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Patrick Petignat; Michel Roy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2007-10-13

2.  Keratin 17 in premalignant and malignant squamous lesions of the cervix: proteomic discovery and immunohistochemical validation as a diagnostic and prognostic biomarker.

Authors:  Luisa F Escobar-Hoyos; Jie Yang; Jiawen Zhu; Julie-Ann Cavallo; Haiyan Zhai; Stephanie Burke; Antonius Koller; Emily I Chen; Kenneth R Shroyer
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 7.842

3.  Localized cervical cancer (stage <IIB): accuracy of MR imaging in planning less extensive surgery.

Authors:  R Manfredi; B Gui; A Giovanzana; S Marini; M Di Stefano; G Zannoni; G Scambia; L Bonomo
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Preoperative MR staging of cervical carcinoma: are oblique and contrast-enhanced sequences necessary?

Authors:  Susanne Fridsten; Ann-Cathrin Hellström; Kristina Hellman; Anders Sundin; Boel Söderén; Lennart Blomqvist
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2016-11-22

5.  Cervical Cancer Staging in Saudi Arabia Clinicoradiological Correlation.

Authors:  Nisreen Anfinan
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-06-23       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.