Literature DB >> 16013621

Surgical management of early stage invasive breast cancer: a practice guideline.

David McCready1, Claire Holloway, Wendy Shelley, Nancy Down, Paula Robinson, Susan Sinclair, Douglas Mirsky.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the available evidence on sentinel lymph-node biopsy, and to examine the long-term follow-up data from large randomized phase III trials comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy in order to make recommendations on the surgical management of early invasive breast cancer (stages I and II), including the optimum management of the axillary nodes: for the breast--modified radical mastectomy or breast-conserving therapy; for the axilla--complete axillary node dissection, axillary dissection of levels I and II lymph nodes, sentinel lymph-node biopsy or no axillary node surgery. OUTCOMES: Overall survival, disease-free survival, local recurrence, distant recurrence and quality of life. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library databases and relevant conference proceedings were searched to identify randomized trials and meta-analyses. Two members of the Practice Guidelines Initiative, Breast Cancer Disease Site Group (BCDSG) selected and reviewed studies that met the inclusion criteria. The systematic literature review was combined with a consensus process for interpretation of the evidence to develop evidence-based recommendations. This practice guideline has been reviewed and approved by the BCDSG, comprising surgeons, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, pathologists, a medical sociologist, a nurse representative and a community representative. BENEFITS, HARMS AND COSTS: Breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy with levels I and II axillary node dissection, plus radiotherapy) provides comparable overall and disease-free survival to modified radical mastectomy. Levels I and II axillary dissection accurately stages the axilla and minimizes the morbidity of axillary recurrence but is associated with lymphedema in approximately 20% of patients and arm pain in approximately 33%. Currently, there is insufficient data regarding locoregional recurrence and long-term morbidity associated with sentinel-node biopsy to advocate it as the standard of care. Breast-conserving therapy may offer an advantage over mastectomy in terms of body image, psychological and social adjustment but appears equivalent with regard to marital adjustment, global adjustment and fear of recurrence. RECOMMENDATIONS: Women who are eligible for breast-conserving surgery should be offered the choice of either breast-conserving therapy with axillary dissection or modified radical mastectomy. Removal and pathological examination of levels I and II axillary lymph nodes should be the standard practice in most cases of stages I and II breast carcinoma. There is promising but limited evidence to support recommendations regarding sentinel lymph-node biopsy alone. Patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials investigating this procedure. VALIDATION: A draft version of this practice guideline and a 21-item feedback questionnaire was circulated to 201 practitioners in Ontario. Of the 131 practitioners who returned the questionnaire, 98 (75%) completed the survey and indicated that the report was relevant to their clinical practice. Eighty (82%) of these practitioners agreed that the draft document should be approved as a practice guideline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16013621      PMCID: PMC3211547     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Surg        ISSN: 0008-428X            Impact factor:   2.089


  50 in total

1.  Arm morbidity after breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  I Tengrup; L Tennvall-Nittby; I Christiansson; M Laurin
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.089

2.  Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Edwin R Fisher; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

Authors:  J A van Dongen; A C Voogd; I S Fentiman; C Legrand; R J Sylvester; D Tong; E van der Schueren; P A Helle; K van Zijl; H Bartelink
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-07-19       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Quality of life in breast cancer patients aged over 70 years, participating in the EORTC 10850 randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  J C J M de Haes; D Curran; N K Aaronson; I S Fentiman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.162

5.  Clinical practice guidelines for the care and treatment of breast cancer: 13. Sentinel lymph node biopsy.

Authors:  J Cantin; H Scarth; M Levine; M Hugi
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-07-24       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

Authors:  N Wolmark; J Wang; E Mamounas; J Bryant; B Fisher
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2001

7.  Preoperative chemotherapy in primary operable breast cancer: results from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10902.

Authors:  J A van der Hage; C J van de Velde; J P Julien; M Tubiana-Hulin; C Vandervelden; L Duchateau
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Stewart Anderson; John Bryant; Richard G Margolese; Melvin Deutsch; Edwin R Fisher; Jong-Hyeon Jeong; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Natale Cascinelli; Luigi Mariani; Marco Greco; Roberto Saccozzi; Alberto Luini; Marisel Aguilar; Ettore Marubini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer.

Authors:  Umberto Veronesi; Giovanni Paganelli; Giuseppe Viale; Alberto Luini; Stefano Zurrida; Viviana Galimberti; Mattia Intra; Paolo Veronesi; Chris Robertson; Patrick Maisonneuve; Giuseppe Renne; Concetta De Cicco; Francesca De Lucia; Roberto Gennari
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  26 in total

1.  Locoregional therapy of locally advanced breast cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  M Brackstone; G G Fletcher; I S Dayes; Y Madarnas; S K SenGupta; S Verma
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  The breast surgeons' approach to mastectomy and prepectoral breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Toni Storm-Dickerson; Noemi M Sigalove
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-02

3.  Breast Cancer among Women Living in Poverty: Better Care in Canada than in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin M Gorey; Nancy L Richter; Isaac N Luginaah; Caroline Hamm; Eric J Holowaty; GuangYong Zou; Madhan K Balagurusamy
Journal:  Soc Work Res       Date:  2015-05-21

4.  (18)F-FDG PET/CT with Contrast Enhancement for Evaluation of Axillary Lymph Node Involvement in T1 Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Eun Jung Kong; Kyung Ah Chun; Ihn Ho Cho; Soo Jung Lee
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-06-15

5.  Surgical treatment choices for breast cancer in Newfoundland and Labrador: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Farah McCrate; Elizabeth Dicks; Erin Powell; Joanne Chafe; Rebecca Roome; Charlene Simmonds; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Improving work-up of the abnormal mammogram through organized assessment: results from the ontario breast screening program.

Authors:  May Lynn Quan; Rene S Shumak; Vicky Majpruz; Claire M D Holloway; Frances P O'Malley; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Staging the axilla with selective sentinel node biopsy in patients with previous excision of non-palpable and palpable breast cancer.

Authors:  R Ruano; M Ramos; J R Garcia-Talavera; E Serrano; A De Arriba; J Gonzalez-Orus; M Iglesias; M C Macias
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Factors associated with fatigue after surgery in women with early-stage invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  Christine Rotonda; Francis Guillemin; Franck Bonnetain; Michel Velten; Thierry Conroy
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013-02-12

9.  Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study.

Authors:  Volker Arndt; Christa Stegmaier; Hartwig Ziegler; Hermann Brenner
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Clinicians' concerns about decision support interventions for patients facing breast cancer surgery options: understanding the challenge of implementing shared decision-making.

Authors:  Lisa J M Caldon; Karen A Collins; Malcolm W Reed; Stephanie Sivell; Joan Austoker; Alison M Clements; Julietta Patnick; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.