Literature DB >> 16012445

Lifeline registry of endovascular aneurysm repair: long-term primary outcome measures.

.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the long-term outcome after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA).
METHODS: Review the primary outcome measures of patients treated with endovascular grafts (EG) in the Lifeline Registry of EVAR. The registry contains data on 2,664 EG patients and 334 open surgical control (SC) patients collected under four multicenter Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) clinical trials that lead to United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval with mandatory 5-year follow-up. Primary outcome measures include operative mortality, AAA-related death, all-cause mortality, aneurysm rupture, and surgical conversion.
RESULTS: Pooled data from IDE clinical trials revealed that EG patients were 3 years older (73 +/- 8 years) than SC patients (70 +/- 8 years, P < .01) and had significantly more cardiac comorbidities before treatment. However, there was no difference in 30-day operative mortality between EG (1.7%) and SC (1.4%) (P = .72). Both EG and SC were successful in preventing rupture, with freedom from aneurysm rupture in 99.8% of EG and 100% of SC patients at 1 year (P = .51). Freedom from rupture remained at 99% in years 1 to 6 after EG, with no increasing risk of late rupture. There was no significant difference in the AAA-related death rate at 1 year between EG (98.2%) and SC (98.6%) (P = .64). Freedom from AAA-related death remained at 98% in years 1 to 6 after EG, with no increasing risk of late AAA-related death. Kaplan-Meier analysis at 6 years revealed freedom from aneurysm rupture in 99%, freedom from AAA-related death in 98%, and freedom from surgical conversion in 95% of EG patients. There was no difference in survival at 4 years between EG (74%) and SC (71%) (P = .49). Overall EG patient survival at 5 years was 66% and at 6 years was 52%. Women had a higher risk of rupture (2.4%) than men (1.2%) (P = .01) and a higher rate of surgical conversion (8.3%) than men (3.8%) (P < .01) but had the same low AAA-related death rate (3.5%) as men (2.1%) (P = .16) at 5 years. Most secondary interventional procedures (85%) were performed < or =30 days after EVAR. Freedom from secondary intervention was 84% at 1 year and 78% at 5 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular aneurysm repair using FDA-approved devices is a safe, effective, and durable treatment for anatomically suited patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16012445     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.05.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  15 in total

1.  Open treatment versus endovascular repair for aortic abdominal aneurysm-keeping the balance.

Authors:  Wtgj Bos; T Cohen; G Vourliotakis; Mrhm van Sambeek; Elg Verhoeven
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2009-12-14

2.  Causes of late mortality after endovascular and open surgical repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Dale Tavris; F Lee Lucas; Thomas Gross; Elliott S Fisher; Samuel R G Finlayson
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Long-term outcomes after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade.

Authors:  David C Brewster; John E Jones; Thomas K Chung; Glenn M Lamuraglia; Christopher J Kwolek; Michael T Watkins; Thomas M Hodgman; Richard P Cambria
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Defining perioperative mortality after open and endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in the US Medicare population.

Authors:  Marc L Schermerhorn; Kristina A Giles; Teviah Sachs; Rodney P Bensley; A James O'Malley; Philip Cotterill; Bruce E Landon
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2011-02-04       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Ten-year comparison of all-cause mortality after endovascular or open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a propensity score analysis.

Authors:  Hong-Gi Lee; Daniel G Clair; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Conversion from endovascular to open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Klaas H J Ultee; Peter A Soden; Sara L Zettervall; Jeremy Darling; Hence J M Verhagen; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Ten-year results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair from a large multicenter registry.

Authors:  Robert W Chang; Philip Goodney; Lue-Yen Tucker; Steven Okuhn; Hong Hua; Ann Rhoades; Nayan Sivamurthy; Bradley Hill
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Lifeline registry of endovascular aneurysm repair: open repair surgical controls in clinical trials.

Authors:  Robert M Zwolak; Anton N Sidawy; Roy K Greenberg; Marc L Schermerhorn; Rebecca J Shackelton; Flora S Siami
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-23       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 9.  Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Long-term survival After Elective Infrarenal Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair 1969-2011: 5 Year Survival Remains Poor Despite Advances in Medical Care and Treatment Strategies.

Authors:  S S Bahia; P J E Holt; D Jackson; B O Patterson; R J Hinchliffe; M M Thompson; A Karthikesalingam
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 7.069

Review 10.  Effects of study design and trends for EVAR versus OSR.

Authors:  Robert Hopkins; James Bowen; Kaitryn Campbell; Gord Blackhouse; Guy De Rose; Teresa Novick; Daria O'Reilly; Ron Goeree; Jean-Eric Tarride
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.