Literature DB >> 16011836

Wrist impact velocities are smaller in forward falls than backward falls from standing.

Juay-Seng Tan1, Janice J Eng, Stephen N Robinovitch, Brady Warnick.   

Abstract

The wrist is a common fracture site for both young and older adults. The purpose of this study was to compare wrist kinematics in backward and forward falls with different fall protective responses. We carried out within-subject comparison of impact velocities and maximum velocities during descent of the distal radius among three different fall configurations: (a) backward falls with knees flexed, (b) backward falls with knees extended and (c) forward falls with knees flexed. We also examined the effect of fall configuration on fall durations, elbow flexion, trunk flexion and forearm angles at impact. Forward falls resulted in smaller impact velocities of the distal radius, longer fall duration, longer braking duration, greater elbow flexion and more horizontal landing position of the forearm compared to backward falls. The distal radius impact velocity during forward falls (1.33 m/s) was significantly lower than in backward falls, and among the backward falls the impact velocity of the flexed knee strategy (2.01 m/s) was significantly lower than the extended knee strategy (2.27 m/s). These impact velocities were significantly reduced from the maximum velocities observed during descent (forward falls=3.57 m/s, backward falls with knee flexed=3.16 m/s, backward falls with knees extended=3.52 m/s). We conclude that (1) smaller impact velocities of the wrists in forward falls could imply a lower fracture risk compared to backward falls, and (2) fall protective responses reduced wrist impact velocities in all fall directions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16011836     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

1.  Fall risk during opposing stance perturbations among healthy adults and chronic stroke survivors.

Authors:  Prakruti J Patel; Tanvi Bhatt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Two types of slip-induced falls among community dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Feng Yang; Debbie Espy; Tanvi Bhatt; Yi-Chung Pai
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Protective arm movements are modulated with fall height.

Authors:  James Borrelli; Robert Creath; Mark W Rogers
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Variations in situational risk factors for fractures of the distal forearm, hip, and vertebrae in older women.

Authors:  Wen-Yu Yu; Hei-Fen Hwang; Mau-Roung Lin
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.921

Review 5.  The Role of Fall Biomechanics in the Cause and Prevention of Bone Fractures in Older Adults.

Authors:  Vicki Komisar; Stephen Neil Robinovitch
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Simple fall criteria for MEMS sensors: data analysis and sensor concept.

Authors:  Alwathiqbellah Ibrahim; Mohammad I Younis
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Influence of the Backward Fall Technique on the Sagittal Linear Acceleration of the Head during a Fall.

Authors:  Andrzej Mroczkowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.