J L Loughridge1, J Barratt. 1. Community Dietitian for Schools, North Tyneside, Wallsend, Tyne and Wear, UK. jane.loughridge@northyneside.gov.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Secondary school students often do not drink sufficient quantities of water during the school day to prevent dehydration, promote learning and good health. The study aimed to measure the effect of health promotion and the free provision of cooled filtered water on the consumption of water and soft drinks. It also aimed to explore students' views of drinking water provision. METHODS: A study was conducted with three secondary schools in North Tyneside. Over a 3 month period one school was given cooled filtered water and active promotion (W + P), another had water only (W). The control school (C) took part in post-intervention focus group work. RESULTS: The average volume of water drunk by students, in school 'W + P' was greater (P = 0.05) than that drunk in school 'W' and control school 'C'. The volume of soft drinks purchased by students in all three schools before and during the intervention remained static. Focus group data revealed that students viewed their existing water provision as poor and wanted sufficient supplies of cooled filtered water in school. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that active promotion of water drinking increased consumption of water by secondary school students. Further developments of the project are suggested.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Secondary school students often do not drink sufficient quantities of water during the school day to prevent dehydration, promote learning and good health. The study aimed to measure the effect of health promotion and the free provision of cooled filtered water on the consumption of water and soft drinks. It also aimed to explore students' views of drinking water provision. METHODS: A study was conducted with three secondary schools in North Tyneside. Over a 3 month period one school was given cooled filtered water and active promotion (W + P), another had water only (W). The control school (C) took part in post-intervention focus group work. RESULTS: The average volume of water drunk by students, in school 'W + P' was greater (P = 0.05) than that drunk in school 'W' and control school 'C'. The volume of soft drinks purchased by students in all three schools before and during the intervention remained static. Focus group data revealed that students viewed their existing water provision as poor and wanted sufficient supplies of cooled filtered water in school. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study indicates that active promotion of water drinking increased consumption of water by secondary school students. Further developments of the project are suggested.
Authors: Brian Elbel; Tod Mijanovich; Courtney Abrams; Jonathan Cantor; Lillian Dunn; Cathy Nonas; Kristin Cappola; Stephen Onufrak; Sohyun Park Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Leah Frerichs; Jeri Brittin; Dina Sorensen; Matthew J Trowbridge; Amy L Yaroch; Mohammad Siahpush; Melissa Tibbits; Terry T-K Huang Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Gala D Moreno; Laura A Schmidt; Lorrene D Ritchie; Charles E McCulloch; Michael D Cabana; Claire D Brindis; Lawrence W Green; Emily A Altman; Anisha I Patel Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-12-25 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Ashkan Afshin; Neal L Benowitz; Vera Bittner; Stephen R Daniels; Harold A Franch; David R Jacobs; William E Kraus; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Debra A Krummel; Barry M Popkin; Laurie P Whitsel; Neil A Zakai Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Tommy L S Visscher; Wendy C W van Hal; Lobke Blokdijk; Jaap C Seidell; Carry M Renders; Wanda J E Bemelmans Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2010-04-16 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Erica L Kenney; Steven L Gortmaker; Jill E Carter; M Caitlin W Howe; Jennifer F Reiner; Angie L Cradock Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Anisha I Patel; Laura M Bogart; David J Klein; Kimberly E Uyeda; Jennifer Hawes-Dawson; Mark A Schuster Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2014 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.107