Literature DB >> 16011505

Implementing family intervention following training: what can the matter be?

H Mairs1, T Bradshaw.   

Abstract

Family interventions (FI) have been established as an effective treatment for psychosis. Training in this intervention is now widely available in the UK. This paper reports a review of published literature that investigates whether, following this training, graduates provide this evidence-based treatment for individuals with psychosis and their caregivers. It further seeks to identify the barriers to implementation in cases where the treatment is not provided and assess benefits for service users and carers when it is. The review was conducted using the MEDline, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Embase databases. Studies that have attempted to evaluate the rates of implementation of FI by graduates of FI training programmes were identified, retrieved and reviewed. Six studies investigating the rates of implementation upon graduation were identified. The findings of these six studies were generally consistent. Rates of implementation by graduates of training programmes are usually low and a small number of graduates work with most of the families who are seen. The studies reviewed failed to assess service user and carer outcomes or consider the full range of likely impediments to the implementation of this evidence-based intervention. A key barrier to the implementation of FI is the reliance upon professionally developed and facilitated approaches. Alternative models that are service user and carer-led may provide a potential solution to the problem of implementation. Implications for future research and practice are considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16011505     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2850.2005.00871.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs        ISSN: 1351-0126            Impact factor:   2.952


  7 in total

1.  Family interventions in Schizophrenia: promise and pitfalls over 30 years.

Authors:  Shirley M Glynn
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 2.  Worlds apart? A scoping review addressing different stakeholder perspectives on barriers to family involvement in the care for persons with severe mental illness.

Authors:  Elleke Landeweer; Bert Molewijk; Marit Helene Hem; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Learning from clinicians' views of good quality practice in mental healthcare services in the context of suicide prevention: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Donna L Littlewood; Leah Quinlivan; Jane Graney; Louis Appleby; Pauline Turnbull; Roger T Webb; Navneet Kapur
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Barriers and facilitators when implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a nested qualitative study.

Authors:  Kristiane Myckland Hansson; Maria Romøren; Reidar Pedersen; Bente Weimand; Lars Hestmark; Irene Norheim; Torleif Ruud; Inger Stølan Hymer; Kristin Sverdvik Heiervang
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 2.908

5.  Implementation of a family intervention for individuals with schizophrenia.

Authors:  Amy N Cohen; Shirley M Glynn; Alison B Hamilton; Alexander S Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 6.  Implementing family involvement in the treatment of patients with psychosis: a systematic review of facilitating and hindering factors.

Authors:  Erica Eassom; Domenico Giacco; Aysegul Dirik; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 7.  Why involve families in acute mental healthcare? A collaborative conceptual review.

Authors:  Aysegul Dirik; Sima Sandhu; Domenico Giacco; Katherine Barrett; Gerry Bennison; Sue Collinson; Stefan Priebe
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.