Literature DB >> 16010860

Statistical aspects of bioequivalence testing between two medicinal products.

E Zintzaras1.   

Abstract

A generic drug product (test product) is bioequivalent to an innovator product (reference product) when their bioavailabilities in the same molar dose are similar. Bioavailability is expressed by pharmacokinetic parameters such as the area under plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and the time of maximum plasma concentration (tmax). The assessment of bioequivalence is carried out by in vivo bioequivalence studies. This paper examines and appraises design issues for performing a bioequivalence study: the use of crossover, parallel, replicated, and add-on designs; and the determination of sample size. In addition, it presents the valid statistical approaches for proving bioequivalence: average bioequivalence on transformed and untransformed data; parametric and non-parametric analyses; moment based individual bioequivalence; direct curve comparison metrics.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16010860     DOI: 10.1007/BF03226406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet        ISSN: 0378-7966            Impact factor:   2.441


  17 in total

Review 1.  Individual bioequivalence revisited.

Authors:  M L Chen; L J Lesko
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Novel direct curve comparison metrics for bioequivalence.

Authors:  J E Polli; A M McLean
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Bioequivalence.

Authors:  A Rescigno
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Sample size determination for bioequivalence assessment by means of confidence intervals.

Authors:  E Diletti; D Hauschke; V W Steinijans
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1991-01

Review 5.  Types of bioequivalence and related statistical considerations.

Authors:  W W Hauck; S Anderson
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol       Date:  1992-05

6.  Individual bioequivalence: attractive in principle, difficult in practice.

Authors:  L Endrenyi; G L Amidon; K K Midha; J P Skelly
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.200

7.  Towards a practical strategy for assessing individual bioequivalence. Food and Drug Administration Individual Bioequivalence Working Group.

Authors:  R Schall; R L Williams
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1996-02

8.  In vitro dissolution profile comparison--statistics and analysis of the similarity factor, f2.

Authors:  V P Shah; Y Tsong; P Sathe; J P Liu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Individual bioequivalence--a regulatory update.

Authors:  M L Chen
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 1.051

10.  A comparison of the two one-sided tests procedure and the power approach for assessing the equivalence of average bioavailability.

Authors:  D J Schuirmann
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Biopharm       Date:  1987-12
View more
  2 in total

1.  A bioequivalence study of levothyroxine tablets versus an oral levothyroxine solution in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  N Yannovits; E Zintzaras; A Pouli; G Koukoulis; S Lyberi; E Savari; S Potamianos; F Triposkiadis; I Stefanidis; E Zartaloudis; A Benakis
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Bioequivalence testing of a new tablet formulation of generic fluoxetine.

Authors:  D Jovanović; V Kilibarda; S Dordević; M Jovanović; J Jovic-Stosić; D Srdić; T Knezević
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2006 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.441

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.