Literature DB >> 16010603

Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study.

C Ell1, A May, L Nachbar, C Cellier, B Landi, S di Caro, A Gasbarrini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical impact of push-and-pull enteroscopy (PPE) in patients with suspected or documented small-bowel diseases, in a prospective multicenter trial in three European medical centers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 100 patients (mean age 56 +/- 16 years; range 13 - 90) were included at the three institutions between July and November 2004. The leading symptoms were: acute recurrent or chronic gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 64), polyposis syndrome (n = 8), chronic abdominal pain (n = 7), chronic diarrhea (n = 7), and others (n = 14).
RESULTS: No major PPE-associated complications such as perforation, bleeding, or relevant injury to the small-bowel tissue or mesentery were encountered. Minor complications occurred in 12 %. The mean time required to carry out the procedure from the oral and anal approaches was 75 +/- 19 min (32 - 150 min). The average insertion depths into the small bowel were 200 +/- 70 cm per PPE session (220 +/- 90 cm with the oral approach and 130 +/- 80 cm with the anal approach). The average radiation exposure (including diagnostic and therapeutic interventions) was 2.1 +/- 2.4 min and 155 +/- 159 dGy/cm2. PPE was fully diagnostic in 72 % of cases. The majority of the patients (34 %) were suffering from angiodysplasias; ulcerations and erosions of various etiologies were seen in 16 %, and polyps and tumors in 13 %. The PPE findings played a role in the subsequent treatment in 62 % of the patients. Endoscopic treatments, including argon plasma coagulation, polypectomy, dilation, and foreign-body extraction, were carried out in 42 %. Medical treatment was given in 12 %, and patients were referred for surgery in 8 % of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: This prospective analysis shows that PPE is safe and has a high diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected or known small-bowel disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16010603     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-870126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  44 in total

1.  Small-bowel adenocarcinoma: case report and review of literature on diagnosis of small-bowel tumors.

Authors:  Padmini Krishnamurthy; Sherin E Varghese; N Gopalswamy; Nosrat Hillman; Syed Ahsan Ali
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-02

2.  Pancreatitis, a new complication of double-balloon enteroscopy.

Authors:  Hiroto Kita
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-12

3.  New technology, new complications: pancreatitis complicating double-balloon enteroscopy.

Authors:  G Anton Decker; Jonathan A Leighton; M Edwyn Harrison; Cuong C Nguyen; Ananya Das; Shabana F Pasha; Adyr A Moss; Laurence J Miller
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2007-12

4.  [Endoscopy of the small bowel: light into the dark].

Authors:  D Hartmann; R Jakobs; J F Riemann
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 5.  Therapeutic procedures for submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Laura-Graves Ponsaing; Mark-Berner Hansen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Is double-balloon enteroscopy an accurate method to diagnose small-bowel disorders?

Authors:  Adriana Vaz Safatle-Ribeiro; Rogério Kuga; Robson Ishida; Carlos Furuya; Ulysses Ribeiro; Ivan Cecconello; Shinichi Ishioka; Paulo Sakai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-06-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Double balloon endoscopy associated pancreatitis: a description of six cases.

Authors:  Soeresh V A Jarbandhan; Stijn J B van Weyenberg; Willem M van der Veer; Dimitri G N Heine; Chris J J Mulder; Maarten A J M Jacobs
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Small bowel enteroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher W Teshima; Gary May
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.522

9.  Antegrade double balloon enteroscopy for continued obscure gastrointestinal bleeding following push enteroscopy: is there a role?

Authors:  R Chettiar; W S Selby; A J Kaffes
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Predictors of depth of maximal insertion at double-balloon enteroscopy.

Authors:  Mouen Khashab; Debra J Helper; Cynthia S Johnson; Michael V Chiorean
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.