Literature DB >> 16010447

Patients' awareness, utilization, and satisfaction with treatment modalities for the management of their osteoarthritis.

Angela G Juby1, Ken Skeith, Paul Davis.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, awareness, utilization, and satisfaction of patients with different treatment modalities for osteoarthritis (OA). Patients with a diagnosis of OA of the knee or hip who had attended a rheumatology referral clinic over the preceding 2 years were eligible. A six-page self-administered questionnaire was mailed to them. Responses were anonymous. One hundred and six completed questionnaires were returned. The average age of the respondents was 64 years and included 71 females. Ninety-four percent of respondents had at least 8 years of formal education, and 75% had had OA for at least 5 years. Seventy-five percent successfully defined OA. The majority had heard of most treatment modalities. Seventy-one percent had tried cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors (COXIBs), 79% analgesics, and 56% physiotherapy. Twenty-six percent had had surgery for their OA. Of those that had tried the various treatment options, the most satisfaction occurred with surgery, pool therapy, walking aids, and narcotic analgesics. Fifty-five percent found traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) helpful and 65% benefited from the COXIBs. Treatment reported as providing the most improvement in function was surgery, followed by steroid injections, COXIB therapy, and traditional NSAIDs. Treatment modalities providing the most symptomatic improvement were surgery, followed by COXIBs and steroid injections. When treatment options were compared, their rank ordering differed when considering overall satisfaction, functional improvement, and symptomatic relief. The participants in this study were well informed as to the nature of their disease and its treatment. A wide number of therapies had been tried, most of which were well tolerated. According to patient perception, those undergoing surgical treatment had the best improvement in symptoms and function. For those using anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs or COXIBs) improvement occurred in >50%, though this was less than for physiotherapy and analgesics. Based on this cohort of patients, treatments that were rated highly (such as surgery) were not necessarily those that were the most widely experienced. Conversely, those therapies that were the most widely accessed (such as analgesics) were not necessarily those that provided the maximum perceived benefit. We conclude that in the continued absence of specific disease-modifying therapies for OA, multiple therapeutic options need to be explored to address individual patient's functional and symptomatic needs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16010447     DOI: 10.1007/s10067-005-1102-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 0770-3198            Impact factor:   2.980


  9 in total

1.  Listening to the patient: a practical guide to self-report questionnaires in clinical care.

Authors:  F Wolfe; T Pincus
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Barriers to the effectiveness of any intervention in OA.

Authors:  A Carr
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Arthritis and the aging population: projections of arthritis prevalence in Canada 1991 to 2031.

Authors:  E M Badley; P P Wang
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population.

Authors:  C A Jones; D C Voaklander; D W Johnston; M E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  The needs of patients with arthritis: the patient's perspective.

Authors:  C Neville; P R Fortin; M A Fitzcharles; M Baron; M Abrahamowitz; R Du Berger; J M Esdaile
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1999-04

6.  Variations in patients' adherence to medical recommendations: a quantitative review of 50 years of research.

Authors:  M Robin DiMatteo
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Exploring the priorities of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.

Authors:  D Tallon; J Chard; P Dieppe
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  2000-10

8.  The impact of disabling arthritis.

Authors:  E M Badley
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res       Date:  1995-12

9.  Patients' preferences for characteristics associated with treatments for osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Ratcliffe; M Buxton; T McGarry; R Sheldon; J Chancellor
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 7.580

  9 in total
  4 in total

1.  Criterion validity of the ARthritis Treatment Satisfaction (ARTS) questionnaire: patient satisfaction with treatment and need for switching therapy.

Authors:  Javier Rejas; Jordi Monfort; Miguel A Campillo; Miguel A Ruiz; Antonio Pardo; Javier Soto
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

2.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of duloxetine added to usual care for patients with chronic pain due to hip or knee osteoarthritis: protocol of a pragmatic open-label cluster randomised trial (the DUO trial).

Authors:  Jacoline J van den Driest; Dieuwke Schiphof; Pim A J Luijsterburg; Aafke R Koffeman; Marc A Koopmanschap; Patrick J E Bindels; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Australians with osteoarthritis: satisfaction with health care providers and the perceived helpfulness of treatments and information sources.

Authors:  Martin Basedow; Peter Hibbert; Tamara Hooper; William Runciman; Adrian Esterman
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2016-08-22

4.  Cost-effectiveness of duloxetine for knee OA subjects: the role of pain severity.

Authors:  J K Sullivan; J Huizinga; R R Edwards; D J Hunter; T Neogi; E Yelin; J N Katz; E Losina
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 6.576

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.