Literature DB >> 16010182

Medicaid chemical dependency patients in a commercial health plan: do high medical costs come down over time?

Lawrence J Walter1, Lynn Ackerson, Steven Allen.   

Abstract

A cohort of 197 Medicaid-insured patients presenting for treatment in Kaiser Permanente's outpatient chemical dependency treatment program were observed the year prior to their program intake visit and followed for 3 years afterwards, to compare their medical costs and utilization to demographically matched commercially insured patients entering the same programs. The Medicaid-insured patients on average incurred medical costs 60% higher than non-Medicaid patients during the 12-month preintake period ($5402 vs $3377). [corrected] During the 3 years subsequently, however, both groups of chemical dependency patients displayed significant declines in medical costs, averaging 30% from the baseline period to the third year of follow-up. Cost trends reflected declines in use of hospital days, emergency department visits, and nonemergent outpatient visits. These results may help address concerns among Medicaid managed care providers and payers by giving a more realistic account of the long-term costs of this group of high-utilizing enrollees.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16010182     DOI: 10.1007/bf02291826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res        ISSN: 1094-3412            Impact factor:   1.505


  19 in total

1.  Problem drinking, health services utilization, and the cost of medical care.

Authors:  P K Alexandre; M C Roebuck; M T French; D D Chitwood; C B McCoy
Journal:  Recent Dev Alcohol       Date:  2001

2.  Medicaid patients in a private health maintenance organization: patterns of chemical dependency treatment.

Authors:  Lawrence J Walter; Sujaya Parthasarathy; Steven Allen; Lynn Ackerson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.505

Review 3.  Methods for analyzing health care utilization and costs.

Authors:  P Diehr; D Yanez; A Ash; M Hornbrook; D Y Lin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 21.981

4.  Do adjusted clinical groups eliminate incentives for HMOs to avoid substance abusers? Evidence from the Maryland Medicaid HealthChoice program.

Authors:  Susan L Ettner; Steven Johnson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

Authors:  R B D'Agostino
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  The cost offsets of alcoholism treatment.

Authors:  H D Holder
Journal:  Recent Dev Alcohol       Date:  1998

7.  Comparing the medical expenses of children with Medicaid and commercial insurance in an HMO.

Authors:  G T Ray; T Lieu; R M Weinick; J W Cohen; B Fireman; P Newacheck
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Medicaid and managed care: implications for low-income women.

Authors:  A Salganicoff
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1997

9.  Utilization and cost impact of integrating substance abuse treatment and primary care.

Authors:  Sujaya Parthasarathy; Jennifer Mertens; Charles Moore; Constance Weisner
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Medical services use by patients before and after detoxification from benzodiazepine dependence.

Authors:  K C Burke; W J Meek; R Krych; R Nisbet; J D Burke
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.084

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.