Literature DB >> 16009860

Antithrombotic therapy practices in US hospitals in an era of practice guidelines.

Victor F Tapson1, Thomas M Hyers, Albert L Waldo, David J Ballard, Richard C Becker, Joseph A Caprini, Roger Khetan, Ann K Wittkowsky, Kevin J Colgan, Alicia C Shillington.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antithrombotic therapy is efficacious for the prevention of thromboembolic disease, but it necessitates careful risk-benefit assessment.
METHODS: Antithrombotic therapy data were retrospectively collected from inpatient medical records at 38 US hospitals. Patients treated for atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism and patients given prophylaxis for total knee replacement, total hip replacement, or hip fracture surgery between July 1, 2000, and June 30, 2003, were randomly selected.
RESULTS: The medical records of 3778 patients (53.3% men) were included. The mean patient age was 66.1 years. Of patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk for stroke, only 54.7% received warfarin sodium, and 20.6% received neither aspirin nor warfarin. Of patients with acute myocardial infarction, only 75.5% received aspirin on hospital arrival. After orthopedic surgery procedures, only 85.6% of patients received prophylaxis with a parenteral anticoagulant agent or warfarin. In 49.4% of patients with deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, or both, unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin use was discontinued before an international normalized ratio of 2.0 or greater was achieved for 2 consecutive days. Patients with deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were rarely discharged from the hospital with bridge therapy (an injectable anticoagulant agent plus warfarin), although the length of hospitalization was significantly shorter than if discharged taking warfarin alone (4.0 vs 8.1 days; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: A significant percentage of hospitalized patients do not receive adequate antithrombotic therapy for the primary and secondary prevention of thromboembolic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16009860     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.13.1458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  33 in total

1.  Influence of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 on warfarin dose, anticoagulation attainment and maintenance among European-Americans and African-Americans.

Authors:  Nita A Limdi; Donna K Arnett; Joyce A Goldstein; T Mark Beasley; Gerald McGwin; Brian K Adler; Ronald T Acton
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 2.  Assessing Patient Management and Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation: Does your Health Insurance Plan know more than your Doctor?

Authors:  Sanjeev Saksena; April Slee
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2009-04-01

3.  Is deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis appropriate in the medical wards? A clinical pharmacists' intervention study.

Authors:  Hossein Khalili; Simin Dashti-Khavidaki; Azita Hajhossein Talasaz; Laleh Mahmoudi; Kaveh Eslami; Hamed Tabeefar
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2010-07-13

4.  Reasons for Non-use of Proven Interventions for Hospital Inpatients: Pharmacists' Perspectives.

Authors:  Arden Barry; Peter Loewen; Jane de Lemos; Karen G Lee
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-09

Review 5.  Pharmacy-managed anticoagulation: assessment of in-hospital efficacy and evaluation of financial impact and community acceptance.

Authors:  Jennifer L Donovan; Julie A Drake; Peter Whittaker; Maichi T Tran
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Is there adequate provision of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following hip arthroplasty? An audit and international survey.

Authors:  B A Rogers; S Phillips; J Foote; K J Drabu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Utility of once-daily dose of low-molecular-weight heparin to prevent venous thromboembolism in multisystem trauma patients.

Authors:  C Clay Cothren; Wade R Smith; Ernest E Moore; Steven J Morgan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates following the implementation of extended duration prophylaxis for patients undergoing surgery for gynecologic malignancies.

Authors:  Kathleen M Schmeler; Ginger L Wilson; Katherine Cain; Mark F Munsell; Pedro T Ramirez; Pamela T Soliman; Alpa M Nick; Michael Frumovitz; Robert L Coleman; Michael H Kroll; Charles F Levenback
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism in medical patients and outpatients.

Authors:  Gregg J Stashenko; Victor F Tapson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Designing and implementing effective venous thromboembolism prevention protocols: lessons from collaborative efforts.

Authors:  Greg Maynard; Jason Stein
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.300

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.