Literature DB >> 16008792

Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking.

Mara Cadinu1, Anne Maass, Alessandra Rosabianca, Jeff Kiesner.   

Abstract

This study investigated the role of negative thinking as a potential mediator of performance deficits under stereotype threat. After being assigned to a stereotype-threat or a no-threat condition, 60 female participants were asked to complete a difficult math task. Using the thought-listing technique, women under stereotype threat reported a higher number of negative thoughts specifically related to the test and to mathematics compared with women in the no-threat condition. Moreover, women under stereotype threat also showed a sharp decrease in performance that (a) was most pronounced in the second half of the test and (b) was mediated by the increase in negative thinking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16008792     DOI: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  33 in total

1.  New trends in gender and mathematics performance: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sara M Lindberg; Janet Shibley Hyde; Jennifer L Petersen; Marcia C Linn
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: when performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence.

Authors:  David Gimmig; Pascal Huguet; Jean-Paul Caverni; François Cury
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

3.  Task demands moderate stereotype threat effects on memory performance.

Authors:  Thomas M Hess; Lisa Emery; Tara L Queen
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.077

4.  Age differences in the underlying mechanisms of stereotype threat effects.

Authors:  Lauren E Popham; Thomas M Hess
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 4.077

Review 5.  A review of the stereotype threat literature and its application in a neurological population.

Authors:  Karen A Kit; Holly A Tuokko; Catherine A Mateer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-04-16       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 6.  An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performance.

Authors:  Toni Schmader; Michael Johns; Chad Forbes
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Stereotype Fit Effects for Golf Putting Nonexperts.

Authors:  Lisa R Grimm; Benjamin Lewis; W Todd Maddox; Arthur B Markman
Journal:  Sport Exerc Perform Psychol       Date:  2015-10-05

8.  Examining Gender Differences in Neurocognitive Functioning Across Adulthood.

Authors:  Karen L Siedlecki; Francesca Falzarano; Timothy A Salthouse
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 2.892

Review 9.  Race-norming of neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Philip G Gasquoine
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 7.444

10.  Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: examining the influence of emotion regulation.

Authors:  Michael Johns; Michael Inzlicht; Toni Schmader
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2008-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.